lemonde.fr
Technocratic Authoritarianism: Empoli Warns of New Power Alliance
Giuliano da Empoli's new book warns of a powerful alliance between tech giants and authoritarian leaders, exemplified by actions like Mohammed bin Salman's purge and Nayib Bukele's crackdown, leveraging algorithmic control to consolidate power and suppress dissent, creating a new form of authoritarianism.
- What potential counter-strategies or societal adaptations could mitigate the risks posed by this alliance of tech and authoritarian power?
- Empoli's work suggests a future where established democratic norms are increasingly challenged by this new form of technologically-enabled authoritarianism. The ability to control information and manipulate public opinion through algorithms poses a significant threat to democratic processes and the rights of minorities. This necessitates a critical examination of the role of technology in politics and the development of effective countermeasures.
- What are the most significant implications of the alliance between tech giants and authoritarian populists for global democratic stability?
- Giuliano da Empoli, in his new book, warns of a dangerous alliance between tech magnates and authoritarian populists, whom he calls 'Borgians'. He cites examples such as Mohammed bin Salman's purge of Saudi officials and Nayib Bukele's crackdown on gangs in El Salvador, highlighting the use of shock tactics and algorithmic manipulation to maintain power. This alliance, Empoli argues, represents a new and unprecedented level of political control.
- How do the specific tactics employed by figures like Mohammed bin Salman and Nayib Bukele illustrate the broader strategies of this new form of authoritarianism?
- Empoli's analysis connects the actions of these 'Borgians' to a broader pattern of leveraging technological power for authoritarian ends. The use of algorithmic manipulation on digital platforms allows for unprecedented control over information and public opinion, amplifying the impact of shock tactics and authoritarian policies. This alliance represents a significant shift in the nature of political power in the 21st century.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently portrays the alliance between tech and authoritarian leaders as inherently negative and predatory. The author uses strong, emotive language ('conquistadors,' 'Borgia,' 'predators') to shape reader perception and establish a narrative of impending doom. The headline and opening sentences set this negative tone, and it is sustained throughout.
Language Bias
The text employs highly charged and emotive language ('predators,' 'conquistadors,' 'Borgia,' 'chaos,' 'hour of the predators'). This language is not neutral and clearly frames the alliance and its actors negatively. More neutral terms might include 'powerful figures,' 'influential leaders,' 'political alliance,' and 'technological advancements'.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the alliance between tech magnates and authoritarian populists, potentially omitting other significant factors contributing to global political instability. While the examples provided are illustrative, a broader range of contributing elements could provide a more nuanced perspective. The analysis also seems to lack counterarguments or perspectives from those who might disagree with the author's assessment.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a stark dichotomy between 'predators' (tech magnates and authoritarian populists) and the 'party of advocates' (defenders of democracy and minority rights). This oversimplification ignores the complexities of global politics and the diverse range of actors and motivations involved. Nuances within both groups are not explored.
Gender Bias
The analysis doesn't explicitly focus on gender, and the examples used (Trump, Putin, MBS, Bukele) are all male. This lack of female representation in the examples provided, combined with a lack of discussion on gendered impacts of this described alliance, raises concerns about potential bias by omission. Further analysis is required.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes an alliance between tech magnates and authoritarian populists, which is eroding democratic norms and human rights. This alliance uses algorithmic engineering to manipulate public opinion and consolidate power, leading to instability and undermining democratic institutions. The examples of leaders like Mohammed bin Salman and Nayib Bukele highlight authoritarian tactics and suppression of dissent, directly impacting SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions).