
zeit.de
Tegernsee Brewery Builds Employee Housing to Combat Tourism-Driven Housing Crisis
The Herzoglich Bayerische Brauhaus Tegernsee in Tegernsee, Germany, built 48 apartments for its employees to combat the region's housing shortage caused by high tourism, renting each unit for 690 euros monthly; this proactive measure addresses the difficulty of attracting and retaining staff in high-demand tourist areas.
- What is the impact of the housing shortage in the Tegernsee region on the hospitality industry, and what solutions are being implemented to address this issue?
- The Herzoglich Bayerische Brauhaus Tegernsee built 48 apartments for its employees to address the housing shortage in the Tegernsee region, where high tourism has driven up rental costs. The 690 euro monthly rent for a one-bedroom apartment is considered affordable for the area, and all units were immediately rented.
- How does the housing crisis in regions like Tegernsee compare to similar issues in other German tourist destinations, and what are the common approaches being adopted by businesses to mitigate this problem?
- High tourism in Tegernsee, mirroring trends in other German tourist destinations like Sylt and Berchtesgaden, has caused a significant rise in housing costs. This has created a challenge for businesses in the hospitality industry, making it difficult to attract and retain employees. The Brauhaus's initiative demonstrates a proactive solution to this problem, highlighting the growing need for employers in tourism to provide employee housing.
- What are the potential long-term effects of the increasing housing costs in popular tourist destinations on the tourism industry, and what innovative solutions might be needed in the future to ensure sustainability and accessibility?
- The success of the Herzoglich Bayerische Brauhaus Tegernsee's employee housing initiative suggests a potential model for other businesses struggling with similar issues in high-tourism areas. This trend of businesses investing in employee housing may increase, particularly as it becomes a key factor in attracting and retaining workers and maintaining operational success in the face of housing shortages.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative emphasizes the positive impact of companies providing housing for their employees, showcasing it as a solution to staff shortages in the hospitality sector. The focus on successful case studies of companies building employee housing, like the Herzoglich Bayerische Brauhaus Tegernsee and the Kempinski Hotel Berchtesgaden, potentially downplays the broader systemic issue of unaffordable housing and the limitations of this private-sector solution. The headline (if any) likely would highlight the success stories, further reinforcing this framing. The opening anecdote of Dominik Salzer in his Trachtenjacke also sets a specific tone that emphasizes a local, traditional, almost quaint approach to the problem.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and descriptive. However, terms like "Syltifizierung" and "Monacisierung" (implying a Monaco-like situation) could be perceived as loaded, carrying a negative connotation of exclusivity and high prices. While descriptive, these terms contribute to a negative tone concerning the housing crisis. More neutral alternatives like "high housing costs" or "rapid increase in property prices" could be used. The use of phrases such as "Gamechanger" to describe the impact of employee housing also enhances the positive aspects of company action rather than neutral description.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the housing crisis in the Tegernsee and Berchtesgaden regions, specifically concerning the hospitality industry. While it mentions the broader issue of rising housing costs in Germany and the impact of tourism, it doesn't delve into potential solutions beyond company-provided housing. It omits discussion of government policies aimed at affordable housing or other initiatives to address the wider housing shortage. The perspective of local residents who are not employed in the hospitality industry is also largely absent. The article also does not mention other potential causes of the housing crisis beyond tourism and the influx of wealthy residents. While acknowledging space constraints is reasonable, expanding on broader solutions or other affected populations would strengthen the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by framing the housing issue primarily as a problem for the hospitality industry and its employees. It implies that company-provided housing is the only solution, overlooking the broader societal need for affordable housing and the potential for alternative solutions like government intervention or community initiatives. The framing focuses mainly on high-end hotels and resorts, potentially ignoring challenges faced by employees in smaller establishments or different sectors.
Gender Bias
While the article mentions several individuals, there's no overt gender bias in language or representation. However, the lack of detailed information about the gender composition of hotel staff and employees in the broader context might suggest an unintentional omission. The article could benefit from including data that specifically details the gender breakdown within the hospitality workforce in these areas and further exploring whether the impact of housing shortages is differentially felt among genders.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the construction of employee housing by businesses in the tourism sector to address staff shortages. This initiative directly contributes to decent work and economic growth by ensuring affordable housing for employees, improving working conditions, and reducing labor turnover. The availability of affordable housing attracts and retains employees, supporting business operations and overall economic activity in the region.