smh.com.au
Telegram and Election Disinformation
Analysis of Telegram's role in spreading election misinformation and organizing extremist groups.
English
Australia
PoliticsUs PoliticsElectionSocial MediaDisinformationExtremism
Institute For Strategic DialogueStern Centre For Business And Human RightsUnited Sovereign AmericansPeople’s AuditProud Boys
Katherine KeneallyPaul M. BarrettDonald TrumpKamala HarrisTucker Carlson
- How is Telegram being used to influence the upcoming election?
- Telegram is increasingly used to organize and radicalize individuals and groups, particularly those with election-denying or extremist views. This platform facilitates the spread of misinformation and calls for action, raising concerns about potential violence or disruption around election day.
- How are extremist groups like the Proud Boys utilizing Telegram?
- The Proud Boys, among other extremist groups, are leveraging Telegram to spread election-related misinformation, celebrate a return to relevance, and potentially incite violence. Their posts exhibit a tone of anger and suggest potential for future actions.
- What kind of misinformation is being spread on Telegram regarding the election?
- Right-wing media channels on Telegram amplify misinformation about voting irregularities, creating an atmosphere of distrust and encouraging supporters to monitor and even confront perceived election fraud. This coordinated effort is more impactful and widespread than in previous elections.
- What are some examples of groups using Telegram to organize and promote election-related activities?
- Groups like United Sovereign Americans and the People's Audit utilize Telegram to recruit election monitors, disseminate false claims about voter fraud (e.g., use of Sharpies, illegal immigrant voting), and promote conspiracy theories. These actions aim to undermine election integrity and sow discord.
- What are the potential dangers and concerns regarding the use of Telegram in the context of the election?
- Experts warn that the activity on Telegram, though not always explicitly violent, creates a dangerous environment of misinformation and incitement. The platform's role in organizing offline activity and its reach to extremist groups are of significant concern.