npr.org
The Annihilation of Fish" Finally Gets Theatrical Release
Charles Burnett's "The Annihilation of Fish," a 1999 comedy starring Lynn Redgrave, Margot Kidder, and James Earl Jones, finally gets a theatrical release thanks to restoration efforts after years of distribution delays due to negative early reviews.
- How did critical reviews impact the film's initial distribution and its eventual rediscovery?
- Burnett's film showcases his signature focus on working-class Black families and explores themes of aging, interracial relationships, and mental health. The delayed release highlights the challenges independent filmmakers face, particularly regarding critical reception influencing distribution. The film's success now demonstrates the value of perseverance and collaborative restoration efforts.
- What is the significance of "The Annihilation of Fish" finally receiving a theatrical release after nearly 26 years?
- Charles Burnett's "The Annihilation of Fish," a 1999 comedy finally released theatrically, features three late, great actors: Lynn Redgrave, Margot Kidder, and James Earl Jones. The film, about an odd friendship between a recently released mental patient and a San Francisco woman, was delayed due to negative reviews. Its release is thanks to the restoration efforts of UCLA Film & Television Archive, The Film Foundation, and Milestone Films.
- What broader implications does the film's delayed release and subsequent success have for independent cinema and the representation of underseen narratives?
- The film's eventual release suggests a growing appreciation for Burnett's unique cinematic voice and the importance of preserving overlooked works. Its success could inspire renewed interest in other underseen independent films, especially those by Black filmmakers. The film's themes resonate with contemporary discussions around mental health, intergenerational relationships, and the complexities of love.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing the film's belated release as a triumph and celebrating the actors' performances and the director's unique approach. The headline (if there was one) likely would have mirrored this positivity. This positive framing might overshadow any potential critical shortcomings or limitations of the film itself.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and celebratory, employing terms like "masterpiece," "beguiling," and "ideal match." While these words are not inherently biased, their consistent positive tone might skew the reader's perception. More neutral language could include words like "well-received," "engaging," or "successful pairing." The use of 'odd' or 'loopy' to describe the characters could be viewed as slightly loaded, as they carry mild negative connotations; however, in this context, they appear to be used descriptively rather than judgmentally.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on the rediscovery of Burnett's film and the efforts to restore it, but it doesn't delve into potential negative critical reception or box office performance of the film upon its limited release. The article also lacks analysis of Burnett's other works beyond mentioning a few titles, which might provide a more complete picture of his career and biases in how his work has been received. However, given the focus on the film's rediscovery, this omission may not be intentional bias.
Sustainable Development Goals
The movie highlights an interracial relationship, challenging societal norms and promoting inclusivity, which contributes to reducing inequalities. The rediscovery and release of the film itself, after years of being overlooked, also speaks to overcoming barriers to access and representation in the film industry.