theglobeandmail.com
The Case for Oral Communication in Business
Ryan Standil, owner of Write To Excite, highlights the diminishing use of oral communication in business, advocating for strategic use of phone calls, video conferences, and in-person meetings to improve communication and build stronger relationships, especially for complex or sensitive topics and when emails prove insufficient.
- How can businesses improve internal and external communication by strategically choosing between written and oral communication methods?
- In today's business world, over-reliance on email hinders effective communication. A transactional lawyer highlighted the dwindling skill of in-person interaction, emphasizing the loss of nuanced communication and relationship building. Oral communication, whether by phone, video, or in person, is crucial for complex or sensitive matters and when email exchanges prove insufficient.
- What are the key trade-offs between different oral communication methods (phone, video, in-person) in terms of efficiency, relationship building, and convenience?
- The choice between written and oral communication is a business decision impacting relationships and efficiency. While email offers flexibility, in-person meetings foster stronger connections, although they demand more time. Video calls offer a middle ground, improving efficiency through non-verbal cues but lacking the spontaneity of in-person interactions.
- How can organizations adapt their communication strategies to maintain strong team cohesion and effective collaboration in a hybrid or fully remote work environment?
- The future of workplace communication hinges on a balanced approach, strategically combining in-person meetings for crucial relationship-building with virtual options for convenience. Companies must consciously recreate organic interactions in digital spaces to maintain team cohesion and morale in remote work environments. Prioritizing in-person contact for high-stakes situations, such as securing promotions or launching key projects, can yield a significant advantage.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly favors in-person communication, presenting it as superior in building relationships and achieving business success. The use of anecdotes from successful individuals reinforces this bias. The headline (if there were one) would likely emphasize the importance of in-person interactions. The introduction sets the tone by highlighting a lawyer's concern about declining in-person communication.
Language Bias
The author uses language that leans positively towards in-person communication, describing it with terms like "meaningful relationships," "stronger impression," and "blossom." Conversely, email and video calls are described with terms suggesting limitations like "taxing on your schedule" or "homogeneous video calls." More neutral alternatives might include 'efficient,' 'convenient,' 'effective,' and 'productive' for all communication methods.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the benefits of in-person communication and gives less attention to the potential downsides or limitations. While it mentions the convenience of email and video calls, it doesn't delve into situations where those methods might be superior (e.g., time zone differences, accessibility issues, large group communications). The lack of discussion on the challenges of in-person meetings (travel time, cost, scheduling conflicts) creates a potentially unbalanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the communication choice as solely between in-person meetings and email/video calls. It overlooks other communication methods such as written reports, instant messaging, or project management software. The framing simplifies a complex issue and doesn't consider the various nuances and contextual factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the importance of effective communication in the workplace, emphasizing in-person interactions for stronger relationships and better business outcomes. Improved communication leads to increased efficiency and productivity, contributing to economic growth and better working conditions. The discussion on balancing in-person and virtual meetings also reflects the evolving nature of work and the need for adaptable strategies in a modern economy.