repubblica.it
The Forgotten Legacy of Roosevelt's New Deal
On March 4, 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's inauguration marked the beginning of the New Deal, a response to the Great Depression that combined economic recovery with social reforms, yet 60 years later, its significance is largely forgotten in the US and abroad.
- What were the immediate consequences of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's inauguration and the New Deal, and how did they change the course of American history?
- Sixty years after Franklin Delano Roosevelt's inauguration on March 4, 1933, the significance of the New Deal is largely forgotten in the US, despite initiating the longest and most dramatic presidency, addressing the gravest modern capitalist crisis and setting a precedent for democratic governance. The anniversary passes largely unnoticed, highlighting a failure to recognize the historical importance of Roosevelt's reforms.
- How did Cold War politics and subsequent conservative administrations contribute to the erosion of the New Deal's legacy and the current lack of widespread remembrance?
- The lack of commemoration reflects the effects of Cold War-era attacks on Roosevelt's legacy (e.g., McCarthyism) and subsequent conservative administrations that undermined his reforms. This amnesia about the New Deal's success in addressing economic crisis and promoting social justice underscores a broader ignorance of practical democracy worldwide.
- What are the potential long-term implications of the widespread forgetting of the New Deal, and what lessons can be learned from this historical amnesia for preventing future social and economic catastrophes?
- The neglect of Roosevelt's legacy foreshadows potential future crises. Ignoring the New Deal's success in balancing economic recovery with social reform risks repeating past mistakes. The failure to recognize Roosevelt's achievement highlights a dangerous disconnect between historical lessons and current policy decisions, increasing vulnerability to similar economic and social calamities.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Roosevelt and the New Deal extremely positively, portraying Roosevelt as a courageous and transformative leader. The headline (if there was one) and the opening paragraphs strongly emphasize the significance of Roosevelt's inauguration and the positive impact of the New Deal. This positive framing might influence readers to view Roosevelt and the New Deal more favorably than a more balanced account might allow.
Language Bias
The article uses overwhelmingly positive and laudatory language to describe Roosevelt and the New Deal. Words such as "coraggioso" (courageous), "drammatica" (dramatic), and "autenticamente politico" (authentically political) are loaded terms that convey strong positive connotations. There is a lack of neutral or critical language to balance this positive portrayal. For example, instead of "un uomo aperto cominciava ad aprire l'America" (an open man began to open America), a more neutral phrasing could be "Roosevelt's presidency marked a significant period of change in American society.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of the New Deal and Roosevelt's presidency, neglecting potential negative consequences or criticisms. There is no mention of any opposition to the New Deal's policies, or any discussion of its long-term effects or unintended consequences. This omission creates an incomplete picture and potentially misleads the reader into believing the New Deal was universally lauded and entirely successful.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a stark contrast between the supposed perfection of the pre-New Deal era and the positive transformation brought about by Roosevelt. This oversimplifies the complexity of the situation before the New Deal, ignoring nuances and alternative perspectives on the economic and social issues of that time. It fails to acknowledge any potential benefits of the pre-existing systems.
Gender Bias
The article mentions Eleanor Roosevelt, but only briefly and in the context of her family life and observations of the political climate. Her political contributions and influence are not explicitly addressed. This omission could be seen as a form of gender bias, underrepresenting women's role in shaping the New Deal.
Sustainable Development Goals
The New Deal policies under President Roosevelt aimed to reduce inequality by implementing social reforms and economic recovery programs that benefited impoverished citizens and protected the dignity and ethical principles of democracy and good governance. The programs targeted financial and banking sectors, and promoted a more equitable distribution of wealth and opportunity, contrasting with the plutocratic tendencies of the preceding era.