elpais.com
The Great Reset": Plan to Dismantle or Reform the EU Gains Far-Right Backing
Two conservative think tanks, Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium, have proposed a plan ("The Great Reset") to either drastically reform or dissolve the European Union, which is backed by Spain's Vox party and other similar parties in other EU countries.
- How does "The Great Reset" plan aim to alter the balance of power between national governments and EU institutions?
- Vox, Spain's third-largest party, supports this plan, marking a significant shift from vague anti-EU rhetoric to concrete proposals for restructuring the Union. This support is mirrored by similar far-right parties in other EU nations, such as the Fidesz party in Hungary and Law and Justice party in Poland. The plan aims to curb the EU's power, increase national sovereignty, and limit EU influence in areas like education and moral values.
- What are the immediate implications of Vox's support for "The Great Reset" plan proposed by Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium?
- Two Polish and Hungarian think tanks, Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium, respectively, have published "The Great Reset", a detailed plan to dismantle or drastically reform the European Union. The plan proposes either returning to a 1957-like EU focused on free trade or dissolving the current EU and creating a new, more limited organization.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of implementing either option A or option B of "The Great Reset" plan for the future of European integration?
- The success of this plan could lead to a significantly weakened EU, with diminished ability to address cross-border challenges like climate change, economic crises, and migration. National governments would gain substantial power, potentially leading to increased divergence in policy and potentially hindering the EU's ability to compete on the global stage. The long-term consequences for European integration remain uncertain.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium's "Great Reset" document as a detailed plan to dismantle the EU, using strong language like "reduce to ashes." This framing emphasizes the negative aspects of their proposal and potentially influences the reader's perception of the plan's implications. The headline and introduction contribute to this framing by highlighting the radical nature of the proposals.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language to describe the Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium's plans, such as "reduce to ashes" and "monster bureaucratized." These terms carry negative connotations and influence the reader's perception of the proposals. More neutral alternatives could include "significantly restructure" and "complex bureaucratic structure". The frequent use of terms like "ultra-right" could also be considered biased.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the plans of Ordo Iuris and Mathias Corvinus Collegium, and their collaboration with Vox. While it mentions other parties involved in similar ideologies across Europe, a more comprehensive overview of the various perspectives on the future of the EU would provide a more balanced analysis. The lack of direct quotes from EU officials or representatives from other major political parties limits the scope of different viewpoints.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the debate as only two options: dismantling the EU or creating a 'mini-version'. It ignores the possibility of reform or other intermediate solutions to address concerns about the EU's current structure and trajectory.
Gender Bias
The article includes several women's perspectives (Anna López and Nuria Alabao) as expert opinions. However, a more thorough analysis is needed to assess whether gender balance extends to other aspects of the article, including the choice of sources and the language used to describe individuals.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses a plan to dismantle or significantly restructure the European Union, potentially leading to increased inequality among EU member states. A less integrated EU could result in uneven distribution of resources and opportunities, exacerbating existing inequalities. The plan prioritizes national sovereignty over collective action, which could hinder efforts to address social and economic disparities within and between countries.