The Ring's Top 10 Pound-for-Pound Boxers: Usyk Leads in 2024

The Ring's Top 10 Pound-for-Pound Boxers: Usyk Leads in 2024

cnnespanol.cnn.com

The Ring's Top 10 Pound-for-Pound Boxers: Usyk Leads in 2024

The Ring magazine has ranked its top 10 pound-for-pound boxers in 2024, with Oleksandr Usyk leading the list as the undisputed heavyweight champion, followed by Naoya Inoue, Terence Crawford, and others showcasing the current strength of the sport.

Spanish
United States
SportsCelebritiesBoxingCanelo AlvarezTerence CrawfordOleksandr UsykWorld BoxingNaoya Inoue
AmbOmbCmbFibConsejo Mundial De Boxeo (Cmb)The Ring
Oleksandr UsykNaoya InoueTerence CrawfordDmitry BivolArtur BeterbievJesse RodriguezJunto NakataniCanelo AlvarezShakur StevensonDavid BenavidezMuhammad AliSugar Ray LeonardMarvin HaglerCarlos MonzónThomas HearnsRoberto DuránAnthony JoshuaDaniel DuboisRicky BurnsViktor PostolArtur BeterbievCanelo AlvarezChris DiazJeremia NakathilaRobson ConceiçãoShuichiro YoshinoRonald GavrilJuan Francisco EstradaPhumelela CafuCarlos CuadrasGennadiy GolovkinMiguel CottoAmir KhanSergey KovalevBilly Joe SaundersEdwin De Los SantosMurodjon Akhmadaliev
Which boxers stand out among the top 10, and what are their notable achievements or upcoming fights?
Naoya Inoue (number 2) is the undisputed super-bantamweight champion, known for his knockout power. Terence Crawford (number 3) is a three-division champion, aiming for a fourth against Canelo Alvarez. Dmitry Bivol (number 4) recently defeated Artur Beterbiev to become the undisputed light heavyweight champion.
Who is ranked as the number one pound-for-pound boxer by The Ring magazine, and what are their significant achievements?
Oleksandr Usyk is ranked number one. He's the undisputed world heavyweight champion (WBA, WBO, IBF, and IBO), having defeated Anthony Joshua twice and recently knocked out Daniel Dubois. He's also a former cruiserweight champion and 2012 Olympic medalist.
How does the current state of boxing, as represented by this ranking, compare to previous eras often considered golden ages?
While past eras like the 1960s (Muhammad Ali) and 1970s-80s (Sugar Ray Leonard, Marvin Hagler, etc.) are considered golden ages, Mauricio Sulaiman, WBC president, cited 2021 as boxing's best year. This current top 10 demonstrates a high level of talent across weight classes, suggesting a strong present for the sport.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a positive framing of boxing, highlighting its history, legendary figures, and current top contenders. The focus on The Ring magazine's ranking reinforces a sense of authority and legitimacy, potentially overshadowing other perspectives on the sport's current standing. The inclusion of historical references to boxing's golden ages (1960s, 70s, 80s) might subtly suggest a decline in the sport's popularity compared to those eras, although the article also mentions 2021 as a peak year according to the WBC president. This juxtaposition creates a somewhat ambivalent framing.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally descriptive and celebratory, employing phrases like "leyenda ucraniana" (Ukrainian legend), "máxima estrella" (top star), and "Monstruo" (Monster). While evocative, these terms are not inherently biased, but they contribute to a generally positive and enthusiastic tone. The use of words like "devastadores nocauts" (devastating knockouts) and "puños de acero" (steel fists) adds to the dramatic and exciting presentation of the sport, but might slightly sensationalize the violence involved. Neutral alternatives could include 'powerful punches' instead of 'devastating knockouts'.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the top 10 boxers according to The Ring magazine, neglecting other potential ranking systems or viewpoints on who the best boxers are. There's no mention of controversies or criticisms surrounding boxing, such as concerns about brain injuries or the business practices of promoters. The lack of discussion about the broader social and economic aspects of boxing, beyond its historical significance and current top fighters, could also be considered an omission. Given the length of the article, this level of omission is somewhat understandable, but it would benefit from greater balance.

1/5

False Dichotomy

The article doesn't present a clear false dichotomy, although the repeated emphasis on The Ring's ranking implicitly creates a sense that this is THE definitive ranking, overlooking the subjective nature of such lists and the existence of other valid criteria for evaluating boxers.

4/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses primarily on the achievements and fighting styles of male boxers, with no mention of prominent female boxers. While the text does not contain explicit gendered language, the complete lack of female representation constitutes a bias by omission. This omission perpetuates the perception of boxing as a predominantly male sport and ignores the significant contributions of women boxers.

Sustainable Development Goals

Reduced Inequality Positive
Indirect Relevance

The article highlights the success of several boxers from diverse backgrounds, including Ukraine, Japan, USA, Kyrgystan, Chechnya, Mexico, and more. Their achievements showcase the potential for individuals from various socioeconomic circumstances to achieve global recognition and success through dedication and hard work. This indirectly contributes to reducing inequalities by providing role models and inspiring people from disadvantaged backgrounds.