liberation.fr
The Rise of Fascism: A Warning from Hugues Jallon's 'Le Temps des Salauds'
Hugues Jallon's new book, "Le Temps des Salauds," analyzes the resurgence of fascism in France, identifying collaborators and outlining the mechanisms enabling its normalization.
- How does the book characterize the different actors involved in the normalization of fascism?
- Jallon categorizes actors into 'fools,' who are the hardcore far-right activists; 'scoundrels,' the knowing collaborators advancing fascism for personal gain; and 'idiots,' who are passive participants. The 'scoundrels' are highlighted as the most dangerous, actively contributing to the normalization process.
- What are the key mechanisms identified in "Le Temps des Salauds" that facilitate the normalization of fascism in France?
- Jallon's book highlights the complicity of 'moderate' politicians, business leaders, and journalists who, knowingly or unknowingly, advance fascist narratives. He emphasizes the role of media outlets like CNews in shaping public discourse and the influence of wealthy backers.
- What are the potential future implications of the trends analyzed in the book, and what counter-strategies does it suggest?
- Jallon warns of a potential far-right victory in the 2027 elections, facilitated by the normalization of fascist ideas. The book implicitly advocates for strong antifascist mobilization and a clear rejection of collaboration, emphasizing the need to expose and counteract the actions of 'scoundrels' who are actively enabling the rise of fascism.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the rise of fascism in France as an imminent threat, emphasizing the role of 'moderates' and influential figures in enabling it. The headline, if there was one, would likely underscore this impending danger. The introductory paragraph immediately establishes a sense of urgency and alarm, setting a tone of impending doom. This framing could potentially alarm readers and predispose them to accept the author's conclusions without critical examination.
Language Bias
The text uses strong, emotionally charged language such as 'fascism,' 'salauds' (scoundrels), 'cons' (idiots), and 'fous' (madmen). These terms are not objective and lack neutrality. For example, replacing 'salauds' with 'those who knowingly collaborate' and 'fous' with 'extremists' would improve neutrality. The repeated use of these terms reinforces a negative perception of those labeled.
Bias by Omission
While the article details the actions of far-right figures and their supporters, it could benefit from including perspectives from those who disagree with its characterization of the situation. The omission of counterarguments might leave the reader with an incomplete understanding of the political climate and limit their ability to form a fully informed opinion. Further, exploring the nuances of political motivations beyond simple labels could strengthen the analysis. Given the limited scope, it is difficult to know what perspective is left out without reading more.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a stark dichotomy between those who are actively combating fascism and those who are enabling it. While the distinction is important, the analysis fails to acknowledge any internal divisions or complexities within the groups labeled as 'enablers'. This oversimplification reduces the understanding of the issue to a simplistic 'us vs. them' scenario.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses the rise of fascism and extremism, posing a significant threat to democratic institutions and the rule of law. The author highlights the complicity of various actors, including politicians, business leaders, and media figures, in normalizing and enabling this rise. This undermines democratic processes, justice, and strong institutions, hindering progress towards SDG 16.