kathimerini.gr
The Siren Parthenope and the Naming of Naples
The city of Naples, Italy, derives its name from Parthenope, a siren in Greek mythology who, according to legend, drowned herself after failing to lure Odysseus and his men and whose body washed ashore near what is now Naples.
- What is the origin of the name "Naples", and what is its connection to Greek mythology?
- The name "Naples" originates from Parthenope, a siren in Greek mythology. Legend holds that after failing to enchant Odysseus, Parthenope drowned herself, and her body washed ashore near the site of present-day Naples, leading to the city's namesake.
- How has the myth of Parthenope influenced the city of Naples throughout history, and what are some examples?
- The Parthenope myth has influenced Naples' identity and history. During the Napoleonic era, the city was briefly named the "Parthenopean Republic," reflecting the mythological connection. The nickname "Partenopei" for Neapolitans also stems from this association, highlighting a lasting cultural impact.
- What are the broader implications of the Parthenope myth, and how does it relate to the poem "Death by Water" by T.S. Eliot?
- The Parthenope myth reflects themes of alluring danger, failure, and death at sea. Eliot's "Death by Water" similarly explores the themes of death and the sea, reflecting the human experience of mortality and the cyclical nature of life and death, connecting to broader considerations of human vulnerability and loss.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The text presents a narrative that connects the nickname "partenopei" for Neapolitan people, especially football fans, to the mythological Siren Parthenope. This framing emphasizes a negative connotation associated with the nickname, suggesting that it evokes unpleasant historical memories of Neapolitan subjugation. The author's subjective interpretation of the nickname's origins and implications is presented without significantly exploring alternative interpretations or perspectives. The reference to the Napoleonic Parthenopean Republic, followed by its swift downfall, further reinforces this negative framing.
Language Bias
The language used is evocative and emotionally charged, employing words like "poniro" (wicked), "maulistico" (mewing), "daimonikes" (demonic), and "aischē" (shame). This loaded language contributes to the overall negative portrayal of the nickname. While the text aims for a sophisticated and literary tone, the highly subjective and emotionally-driven vocabulary influences the reader's perception.
Bias by Omission
The analysis omits potential counter-narratives or alternative interpretations of the nickname. It focuses heavily on the negative historical context while neglecting any positive or neutral associations that "partenopei" might have for Neapolitans. The piece also fails to examine contemporary Neapolitan sentiment towards this nickname. The absence of these viewpoints limits the reader's ability to understand the full complexity of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only association with the nickname "partenopei" is the negative historical context tied to Parthenope's tragic fate and subsequent subjugation of Naples. It fails to acknowledge the possibility that the nickname could hold complex or evolving meanings for different Neapolitans today.
Sustainable Development Goals
The text indirectly relates to SDG 16 by highlighting a historical period of instability and occupation in Naples, symbolized by the Parthenopean Republic's short-lived existence and subsequent takeover. The narrative evokes themes of conflict, oppression, and the absence of strong, just institutions, which are antithetical to the goals of SDG 16. The quote from T.S. Eliot's poem further underscores the broader theme of loss and vulnerability experienced by individuals within unstable societal structures.