kathimerini.gr
Theatrical Politics: Populism, Propaganda, and the Spectacle of Power
Three recent films—'The Apprentice', 'The Kremlin Wizard', and Obama's Emmy-winning nature documentary series—highlight the increasing intertwining of political leadership with the entertainment industry, driven by social media and a shift in how leaders cultivate influence.
- What are the underlying causes and consequences of this trend?
- The rise of social media, allowing direct engagement with followers and bypassing traditional media, fuels this trend. Consequently, authenticity is replaced by carefully crafted personas, blurring lines between reality and performance. This leads to political discourse increasingly resembling entertainment, prioritizing spectacle over substance.
- What are the future implications of this convergence of politics and entertainment?
- The increasing reliance on entertainment-style politics may lead to further polarization and erosion of trust in traditional institutions. Leaders who master the art of self-promotion and media manipulation gain an advantage, potentially undermining fact-based decision-making. The long-term impact on democratic processes remains uncertain.
- How do these films reveal the evolving relationship between political leadership and entertainment?
- The films showcase a shift from traditional political narratives to a performance-based model. Obama's Emmy win exemplifies leaders leveraging entertainment platforms for influence, while 'The Apprentice' and 'The Kremlin Wizard' portray leaders using media manipulation and image-building as central political strategies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced view of the phenomenon of political leaders' transformation into entertainment figures, mentioning both Obama's Emmy award and Trump's portrayal in a film, as well as Putin's image in another film. It does not explicitly favor one side.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and descriptive, although terms like 'άτρωτους' (untouchable) in reference to leaders who constantly violate boundaries might carry a slightly negative connotation. However, this is mostly contextual and balanced by the overall tone.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including further analysis on how the media's role in shaping these public images impacts democratic processes and public discourse. It focuses more on the phenomenon itself than its wider societal effects. This omission might be due to space constraints.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the increasing influence of spectacle and performance in politics, exemplified by figures like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. This trend undermines democratic institutions and the principles of truth and accountability, potentially leading to erosion of justice and instability. The manipulation of public opinion through social media and propaganda, as highlighted in the article, further weakens democratic processes and strengthens authoritarian tendencies. The focus on image over substance, as seen in the examples cited, is detrimental to effective governance and the rule of law.