cbsnews.com
Thousands of Donated Organs Discarded in the U.S. Due to System Inefficiencies
In 2022, the U.S. discarded one in three recovered kidneys and nearly 12,000 other organs due to competing performance measures incentivizing organ recovery over successful transplantation, leading to a system where more organs are recovered than used, despite efforts to place them; however, innovative solutions, like accepting riskier kidneys, are showing promise.
- What are the main causes of the high number of discarded donated organs in the U.S., and what are the immediate consequences?
- In the US, one in three kidneys from deceased donors and almost 12,000 other organs were discarded in 2022, despite efforts to place them. This is largely due to competing performance measures incentivizing organ recovery but not necessarily successful transplantation, creating a system where more organs are recovered than used. Discarded organs represent a significant loss of potentially life-saving resources.
- How do the performance measures of organ procurement organizations and transplant centers contribute to the organ discard problem?
- The mismatch between organ recovery and transplantation stems from differing incentives: organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are rewarded for recovering organs, while transplant centers prioritize successful transplants. This results in transplant centers rejecting organs deemed too risky, leading to increased discards. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' performance measures contribute to this risk-averse behavior.
- What innovative solutions are being explored to reduce organ discards, and what are the potential long-term impacts of adopting these solutions?
- To address this, federal health officials are investigating ways to reduce organ discards. One successful approach at Hackensack University Medical Center involves accepting riskier kidneys, resulting in a high patient survival rate (97.5%). This model suggests that adjusting the incentive structure and encouraging collaboration between OPOs and transplant centers could significantly decrease organ waste and increase successful transplants.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative focuses strongly on the problem of organ discard and the potential solutions offered by centers like Hackensack University Medical Center. While acknowledging the challenges, the framing subtly positions Hackensack's approach as a superior model without providing a balanced comparison to other approaches or fully acknowledging potential limitations.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "less-than-perfect kidney" could be considered somewhat loaded. Alternatives such as "kidneys with reduced viability" or "kidneys requiring more specialized care" might be more neutral. The descriptions of dialysis are quite negative, but this reflects the reality of the experience for many patients.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the challenges of organ transplantation and the reasons for organ discards, but it could benefit from including data on the success rates of transplanting "less-than-perfect" kidneys across different centers, to provide a more comprehensive view of the practice's efficacy. Additionally, mentioning potential financial implications for patients receiving less-than-perfect kidneys would provide a more holistic perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the decision-making process for transplant centers and patients. While it highlights the tension between accepting less-than-perfect kidneys and the potential risks, it doesn't fully explore the nuances of those risks or potential alternative solutions outside of the current system.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the issue of organ discard in the US, resulting in the loss of potentially life-saving organs. Initiatives to reduce organ discards and improve the organ placement process are directly related to improving health outcomes and ensuring access to life-saving treatments. The example of Hackensack University Medical Center demonstrates a successful approach to increase organ transplantation, improving patient survival rates and quality of life. This directly contributes to SDG 3, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. The article also mentions the negative impact of dialysis on patients