welt.de
Thuringia AfD Convention: Höcke Promotes Pro-Russia Stance, Criticizes Missile Supply to Ukraine
At a Thuringia AfD convention, Björn Höcke delivered a 45-minute speech on the upcoming Bundestag election, criticizing the CDU's plan to supply Taurus missiles to Ukraine, falsely claiming it would lead to German attacks on Moscow, and promoting a vision of European autonomy from the US and a Eurasian economic community, culminating in the passage of a pro-Russia resolution.
- What is the central message of Björn Höcke's speech at the Thuringia AfD state convention, and what are its immediate political implications?
- At their state party convention, over 300 AfD members in Thuringia celebrated Björn Höcke, who delivered a 45-minute address focusing on the upcoming Bundestag election and criticizing the CDU's Friedrich Merz's stance on supplying Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine. Höcke falsely claimed that Merz's policy would lead to German soldiers attacking Moscow, characterizing the AfD as the only party seeking peace with Russia.
- How does Höcke's historical narrative and vision for a Eurasian economic community relate to the AfD's broader political platform and foreign policy positions?
- Höcke's speech framed the current geopolitical landscape as a shift from unipolar US dominance to multipolarity, advocating for European autonomy from the US and echoing Charles de Gaulle's vision of a Eurasian economic community. This rhetoric, coupled with a pro-Russia resolution passed at the convention, aligns with the AfD's increasingly nationalistic and anti-American stance.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the AfD's pro-Russia stance and its narrative concerning German sovereignty, and how might it shape Germany's future role in international affairs?
- The AfD's pro-Russia resolution, which omits mention of Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine, reflects a strategy to exploit anti-American sentiment within Germany while downplaying Russia's aggression. This tactic, along with Höcke's focus on the potential for war with Russia, could significantly impact German voters by diverting attention from Russia's culpability and fostering anti-Western sentiment.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes Höcke's speech and the AfD's positions, giving significant weight to their narrative without sufficient counterpoints from other political perspectives or international consensus. The headline itself, while not overtly biased, might contribute to a skewed perception by highlighting the AfD's actions.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language in several instances. Describing the AfD as "right-wing extremist" is a subjective and potentially biased term. The phrases "völkisch-nationalistic," and "right-extremist" carry strong negative connotations. While the article accurately reflects Höcke's statements, it may benefit from including neutral qualifiers in such instances.
Bias by Omission
The article omits the crucial fact that Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a violation of international law. The resolution passed by the AfD also avoids mentioning this key point, framing the conflict as a war between two equal parties. This omission significantly misrepresents the situation and could mislead readers.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by portraying the choice between supporting Merz (and thus, implicitly, the war in Ukraine) and supporting the AfD's purported pacifism. This ignores the complexities of the situation and other potential political stances.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Björn Höcke's speech at the AfD party congress, where he promotes narratives that undermine peace and international cooperation. His claims about the war in Ukraine, his criticism of the West, and his promotion of a 'Eurasian Economic Community' from Lisbon to Vladivostok align with narratives that challenge the existing international order and promote division. His rhetoric is concerning due to its potential to incite conflict and undermine democratic institutions. The resolution passed at the congress reflects this, omitting the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine and questioning Germany's sovereignty. This undermines the peaceful resolution of conflicts and efforts towards a just international system.