fr.euronews.com
TikTok's Recession Indicators: Fact or Fiction?
While unconventional indicators like lipstick sales and hemlines gain traction on TikTok, experts highlight the limitations of these metrics compared to traditional economic measures like GDP and purchasing manager indices.
- What is the scientific basis for these indicators, and what are the limitations of using them to predict recessions?
- While there might be anecdotal evidence supporting these indicators, there's no strong correlation between them and actual recessions. A study of hemlines and recessions found a very weak correlation with a possible three-year lag. The indicators often reflect only specific consumer segments and lack the comprehensive data needed for reliable economic predictions.
- What are the unconventional recession indicators gaining popularity on platforms like TikTok, and what is their basis?
- TikTok users are discussing so-called "recession indicators," such as increased sales of affordable goods (e.g., Labubu toys) and a resurgence of minimalist beauty trends. These indicators draw on older theories like the Lipstick Index (increased lipstick sales during recessions) and the Men's Underwear Index (decreased underwear purchases).
- What are the more reliable indicators used by economists to gauge recessionary trends, and how do these differ from the anecdotal observations on social media?
- Economists use more robust metrics, including GDP contraction (two consecutive quarters), purchasing manager indices, consumer confidence surveys, and the inverted yield curve (long-term bond yields lower than short-term). Unlike TikTok trends, these indicators offer broader, more comprehensive data and established methodologies for assessing economic health.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents multiple perspectives on recession indicators, including unconventional ones from TikTok and more traditional economic metrics. While it acknowledges the limitations of TikTok trends as predictors, it doesn't overtly favor any single viewpoint. The structure presents both sides fairly, although the inclusion of expert opinions lends more weight to the traditional economic perspective.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. The author uses phrases like "so-called" and "unconventional" to describe the TikTok indicators, but this is done descriptively rather than dismissively. The tone is informative and analytical throughout.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including a broader range of economic indicators beyond those mentioned. While it covers several, it omits others used by economists to predict or assess recessionary trends. This omission is partially explained by the scope of the article, but some additional indicators would improve comprehensiveness.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the use of unconventional "recession indicators" such as lipstick sales and hemlines, reflecting consumer behavior during economic downturns. While not a direct measure of inequality, understanding consumer responses to economic hardship can inform policies aimed at mitigating the impact of recessions on vulnerable populations and reducing income inequality. The discussion of affordable luxuries highlights the coping mechanisms of consumers during difficult economic times, potentially affecting different income groups disproportionately. The focus on consumer trends and spending habits indirectly relates to the reduction of inequalities by understanding how economic hardship affects different segments of society.