theglobeandmail.com
Toronto Bike Lane Removal Proposal
Ontario's plan to remove Toronto bike lanes faces criticism for its cost, ineffectiveness, and potential safety risks.
English
Canada
PoliticsLabour MarketTransportationUrban PlanningCyclingTraffic
Ontario GovernmentCity Of TorontoUniversity Of TorontoThe Canadian PressToronto Star
Doug FordRob FordPrabmeet SarkariaShoshanna SaxeMatt Elliott
- What are the potential financial costs associated with removing bike lanes?
- The proposal to remove bike lanes is estimated to cost a significant amount of money, similar to a previous instance where removing bike lanes cost hundreds of thousands of dollars more than their initial installation. This highlights the economic inefficiency of the plan.
- What is the main proposal by Doug Ford's government regarding Toronto's bike lanes?
- Doug Ford's government in Ontario, Canada, proposes removing bike lanes in Toronto to alleviate traffic congestion. This is despite evidence suggesting that removing bike lanes will not solve congestion and could worsen safety for cyclists and pedestrians.
- What are the broader implications and criticisms of the proposal to remove bike lanes?
- The plan to remove bike lanes is viewed as a costly and ineffective way to address traffic congestion, potentially making the city less safe and environmentally friendly. It's criticized as pandering to a specific group of voters without considering the broader implications.
- What is the expert opinion on the effectiveness of removing bike lanes to solve traffic congestion?
- Experts, including Shoshanna Saxe, an associate professor at the University of Toronto, argue that removing bike lanes will not ease congestion. They contend that increasing car capacity does not solve congestion, and that promoting active transport (walking, biking) and public transport are more effective solutions.
- What evidence contradicts the government's claim that removing bike lanes will improve traffic flow?
- The removal of bike lanes is opposed by city data and research which indicates that they do not cause congestion but rather contribute to traffic flow and safety. The decision appears to be politically motivated to appease voters concerned about traffic.