lemonde.fr
Trafigura Convicted of Bribery Despite Angola Contract Award
A Swiss court convicted Trafigura, a commodities trader, for paying $4.9 million in bribes to an Angolan oil executive between 2009 and 2011, resulting in $143.7 million in profits, despite Angola's ongoing anti-corruption efforts and the company's recent award of a 30-year contract.
- What systemic changes are needed in Angola to prevent similar corruption scandals in the future, and what challenges might hinder these changes?
- Trafigura's conviction and subsequent contract award reveal a potential vulnerability in Angola's anti-corruption campaign. Future success hinges on stronger enforcement of anti-corruption laws and a more transparent process for awarding major contracts, limiting the influence of past corrupt relationships. The long-term implications include potential continued exploitation of Angolan resources and the risk of undermining public trust in the government's reform efforts.
- How does Trafigura's conviction relate to the broader context of corruption under Angola's previous regime, and what efforts are being made to address this legacy?
- The conviction highlights the persistent challenge of combating corruption in Angola's oil sector, even under a new administration committed to anti-corruption efforts. The seemingly contradictory decision to award Trafigura a major contract underscores the complexities of disentangling deep-seated corruption networks and the potential for continued influence of past practices. The scale of the bribe and resulting profits indicate the substantial financial incentives driving such corruption.
- What are the immediate consequences of Trafigura's conviction for its operations in Angola, considering the recent contract awarded despite its history of corruption?
- Trafigura, a Swiss commodities trader, was convicted in a Swiss court for paying bribes totaling $4.9 million to a Sonangol executive between 2009 and 2011, resulting in $143.7 million in profits. This follows years of accusations linking the company to corruption under Angola's former president, José Eduardo dos Santos. Despite this conviction, Trafigura was awarded a 30-year contract by the current Angolan government in 2022.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Trafigura's involvement in Angola negatively by emphasizing its past corruption conviction and the general negative reaction to its name among Angolans. The headline, while not explicitly provided, would likely reinforce this negative framing. The sequencing of information, placing the corruption conviction early in the article, predisposes the reader to view Trafigura's actions with suspicion. While the article mentions Trafigura's statement expressing disappointment with the court decision and efforts to improve compliance, this information is positioned after the negative portrayal, diminishing its impact.
Language Bias
The article uses strong negative language to describe the reaction to Trafigura's name in Angola ('malaise', 'soupire'). The description of the corruption as involving 'juteux contrats' (juicy contracts) also carries a negative connotation. More neutral language such as 'discomfort', 'sighs', and 'lucrative contracts' would provide a more balanced presentation.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Trafigura's past corruption conviction and its connection to the Dos Santos regime, but omits details about the scale and nature of Trafigura's current operations in Angola. It also doesn't elaborate on the due diligence process that led to the awarding of the 30-year railway concession to Trafigura, leaving the reader to wonder about the justification for choosing a company with such a controversial history. The article could benefit from including information about Trafigura's current compliance program effectiveness and details of any safeguards in place to prevent future corruption.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between Lourenço's anti-corruption campaign and the decision to grant Trafigura a major concession. It doesn't explore the complexities of political and economic realities in Angola that might justify such a seemingly contradictory decision. Nuances such as potential political compromises or economic imperatives that outweigh ethical considerations are absent.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a case of corruption involving Trafigura, a Swiss commodity trader, and Sonangol, Angola's state-owned oil company. This resulted in millions of dollars in profits for Trafigura through bribery, exacerbating inequality and undermining fair economic practices in Angola. The fact that Trafigura was later awarded a significant contract despite its conviction further demonstrates the challenges in achieving equitable distribution of resources and economic opportunities.