welt.de
TransnetBW Addresses Public Concerns During Suedlink Construction
TransnetBW, the energy supplier building the 700km Suedlink power line in Germany, is proactively engaging with local communities to mitigate construction disruptions, appointing liaison managers for each phase to address noise, traffic, and other concerns, aiming for completion by 2025.
- How will TransnetBW manage the impact of Suedlink construction on landowners and local communities?
- Suedlink, a 700km power line project costing roughly €10 billion, aims to transport green energy from northern to southern Germany, ultimately supplying 10 million households. The project's scale presents unique challenges, including managing public concerns during the construction phase. TransnetBW aims to mitigate these by proactively communicating timelines and contact information to affected residents and farmers.
- What immediate steps is TransnetBW taking to address public concerns during the Suedlink construction?
- TransnetBW, the energy supplier building the Suedlink power line, is committed to ongoing dialogue with the public. They've appointed liaison managers for each construction phase to handle local concerns regarding noise, traffic disruption, and dirt. These managers will ensure communication between residents and construction crews.
- What long-term implications might Suedlink's construction and operation have for future large-scale energy infrastructure projects in Germany?
- While TransnetBW anticipates completing all permits by 2025 and starting construction across all sections this year, the project's magnitude necessitates continuous adjustment. Managing public acceptance and addressing inevitable on-site issues will be crucial for successful completion. The company's experience with Suedlink will inform future large-scale energy infrastructure projects.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely positive, emphasizing TransnetBW's proactive communication strategy and efforts to minimize disruption. The headline (if any) would likely focus on the company's commitment to public engagement rather than potential downsides or controversies. The article prioritizes the company's perspective and actions, potentially minimizing the voices of those negatively affected.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral, but terms like 'Wehwehchen' (minor issues) downplay the significance of potential negative impacts. The CEO's statement that the issues are 'beherrschbar' (manageable) presents a confident, perhaps overly optimistic, tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on TransnetBW's efforts to mitigate public concerns, but omits discussion of potential negative environmental impacts beyond noise and disruption. There is no mention of the impact on wildlife, ecosystems, or the overall carbon footprint of the project despite its focus on green energy. This omission could be significant, as environmental concerns are often central to large-scale infrastructure projects.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of public acceptance, implying that open communication is sufficient to resolve all concerns. It doesn't fully acknowledge the possibility of deeply rooted opposition to the project based on broader environmental or economic concerns, reducing the issue to manageable 'wehwehchen' (minor issues).
Gender Bias
The article uses gender-neutral language ('Bürgerinnen und Bürgern'). However, it primarily quotes the male CEO, potentially neglecting diverse perspectives from other stakeholders. Further investigation would be needed to determine if this imbalance reflects a broader issue within the project itself.
Sustainable Development Goals
The project focuses on improving infrastructure for clean energy, contributing to sustainable urban development and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Community engagement aims to mitigate negative impacts on residents during construction.