welt.de
Trial for Fake Weight-Loss Injections in Austria
Two men stand trial in Austria for selling fake weight-loss injections to a plastic surgeon, resulting in serious health consequences for one victim. The injections contained insulin instead of the intended active ingredient.
- What are the charges against the two defendants in the Austrian trial?
- Two men are accused of selling fake weight-loss injections to a plastic surgeon in Salzburg, Austria. One of the ingredients in the injections was insulin instead of the intended ingredient. A woman suffered severe side effects after using one of these injections.
- Where did the defendants allegedly obtain the ingredients for the injections?
- The fake injections contained insulin instead of Semaglutide, the active ingredient in the Ozempic medication. The defendants allegedly obtained the ingredients through a woman in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, and sold them for €205 each.
- What was the substance used to replace the intended ingredient in the fake weight-loss injections?
- The trial is ongoing, with a further hearing scheduled for December 16th. The defendants have pleaded not guilty. An investigation is also underway to determine whether the plastic surgeon will also face charges.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story primarily from the perspective of the prosecution's accusations and the negative consequences of using the fake injections. It emphasizes the criminal aspects and less on the broader context of the demand for such treatments and the regulatory challenges related to the sale of medications.
Language Bias
The article uses neutral language; however, the description of the consequences of using fake injections immediately emphasizes the negative impacts, focusing on suffering and harm, which could inadvertently create a biased perception that downplays other aspects of the case.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the criminal charges against the two men, and the negative health consequences for one victim, while providing limited detail on the actions of the plastic surgeon who purchased the injections, and the potential motivations and consequences for all parties involved. This could lead to a skewed perception of the situation, making the accused seem like the sole perpetrators.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a clear narrative of the guilty versus innocent parties, neglecting the complex legal processes and the possibilities of mitigating circumstances or different perspectives that might exist. This could lead readers to assume only one side holds responsibility for the actions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The case directly relates to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) because the use of counterfeit injections caused harm to individuals, highlighting risks associated with unregulated medications and the impact on public health.