lexpress.fr
Trump Announces Campaign to Eliminate Mail-in Voting, Falsely Claims US is Only Country Using It
On August 18, 2024, Donald Trump announced a campaign to eliminate mail-in voting and voting machines, citing false claims of fraud and asserting federal authority over state elections, despite evidence of Republican gains through mail-in voting in 2024; he also claimed that Vladimir Putin agreed that the 2020 election was rigged.
- What are the immediate implications of Trump's announcement to eliminate mail-in voting and voting machines?
- On August 18, 2024, Donald Trump announced a movement to eliminate mail-in voting and voting machines, falsely claiming the US is the only country using mail-in ballots. He plans to issue an executive order to increase "honesty" in the 2026 midterm elections, despite Republicans gaining significantly via mail-in voting in 2024, according to the New York Times.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of Trump's actions on the integrity and future of US elections?
- Trump's actions signal a continued effort to undermine faith in US elections. His focus on mail-in voting and voting machines, despite contradictory evidence, suggests a strategy to influence future elections by controlling voting methods. The conflict between federal and state authority in elections may lead to legal challenges and further polarization.
- How does Trump's claim about the 2020 election and his proposed executive order relate to the established division of power between federal and state governments in US elections?
- Trump's assertion contradicts evidence showing Republican success with mail-in voting in 2024. His claims of widespread fraud and a need for federal control over state elections challenge the established US electoral system, where states manage elections within a federal framework. He cites a conversation with Vladimir Putin who allegedly agreed the 2020 election was rigged due to mail-in ballots.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames Trump's announcement as a central focus, potentially overemphasizing its importance. The headline and introduction could be rewritten to be more neutral. For instance, instead of highlighting Trump's claim as the main point, the introduction could summarize the complex situation around mail-in voting in the US and mention Trump's stance within that broader context.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as "principal idées fixes" and phrases like "TRICHENT À DES NIVEAUX JAMAIS VUS AUPARAVANT" (in French, meaning "CHEATING AT UNPRECEDENTED LEVELS"). More neutral alternatives would improve objectivity. For example, instead of "idées fixes," use "repeated assertions." Instead of the capitalized, emotionally charged phrase, use something like "allegations of widespread fraud.
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential benefits of mail-in voting, such as increased accessibility for certain populations. It also doesn't explore alternative solutions to address concerns about election security besides eliminating mail-in voting entirely. The lack of counterarguments to Trump's claims weakens the analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the debate as mail-in voting versus in-person voting, ignoring the possibility of reforms or improvements to the mail-in voting system to address security concerns.
Sustainable Development Goals
Trump's attempts to dismantle mail-in voting and his claims of a rigged election undermine democratic processes and institutions. His actions incite distrust in electoral systems and threaten the peaceful transfer of power, essential for stable governance. The quote "For the record, the states are merely an agent for the federal government in the counting and calculation of votes. They must do what the federal government, represented by the President of the United States, tells them to do, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY," demonstrates a disregard for the established balance of power between federal and state governments in election administration.