lemonde.fr
Trump Authorizes Large-Scale Deep-Sea Mining, Defying International Regulations
On April 24, 2024, Donald Trump issued a decree authorizing large-scale deep-sea mining, potentially extracting one billion tons of minerals within a decade, challenging international regulations and raising environmental concerns.
- How does the US government's justification for deep-sea mining relate to national security and economic competition with other countries, particularly China?
- The decree aims to extract one billion tons of materials within ten years, potentially creating 100,000 US jobs and boosting the GDP by \$300 billion. This action prioritizes US economic interests and competitiveness with China, which is also pursuing deep-sea mining. The initiative bypasses the ISA's regulations, potentially setting a precedent for other nations.
- What are the immediate consequences of Trump's executive order authorizing deep-sea mining, considering its impact on international regulations and environmental concerns?
- On April 24th, 2024, Donald Trump signed a decree to allow large-scale deep-sea mining, including in international waters. This challenges the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which governs high-seas seabed mining, although the US hasn't ratified the related agreements. The decree instructs the Commerce Secretary to expedite mining permits beyond US jurisdiction and the Interior Secretary to do the same for territorial waters.
- What are the long-term environmental and geopolitical risks associated with deep-sea mining, considering the lack of international consensus and the potential for ecosystem damage?
- This decision may lead to uncontrolled exploitation of a fragile ecosystem, contrary to a moratorium supported by over 30 countries. The focus on economic benefits overlooks potential environmental damage and the lack of international consensus. Future conflicts may arise concerning resource allocation and environmental protection in international waters.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the Trump administration's decision as controversial and environmentally damaging, giving more weight to the concerns of environmental groups than to the potential economic benefits promoted by the administration. The headline and introduction emphasize the negative impacts and the opposition to the initiative. The positive economic arguments are presented later in the text.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language such as "incontrôlée" (uncontrolled), "menacer gravement" (seriously threaten), and "écosystème marin" (marine ecosystem). While these terms accurately reflect the concerns raised, they lack neutrality. More neutral alternatives might include phrases like 'unregulated,' 'pose a significant risk to,' and 'ocean environment.'
Bias by Omission
The article omits discussion of potential economic benefits of deep-sea mining beyond the claims made by the Trump administration. It also doesn't detail the potential environmental mitigation strategies that might be employed. The perspectives of scientists supporting deep-sea mining are absent, creating an imbalance.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between US economic interests and environmental protection. It suggests that the US must exploit deep-sea minerals to compete with China, neglecting the possibility of international cooperation or alternative solutions to resource scarcity.
Sustainable Development Goals
The Trump administration's executive order authorizing large-scale deep-sea mining, including in international waters, poses a significant threat to marine ecosystems. The order contradicts international efforts to regulate deep-sea mining and ignores concerns about the potential environmental damage. Experts warn of negative consequences for ocean health and the numerous species that depend on these vulnerable habitats. The extraction of minerals like manganese, nickel, cobalt, copper, and rare earth elements could disrupt seabed ecosystems, damage biodiversity, and potentially lead to irreversible harm.