kathimerini.gr

Trump Imposes 100% Tariffs on Non-US Films

President Trump announced 100% tariffs on non-US films, citing unfair competition; Australia and New Zealand vowed to defend their film industries, while experts warn of potential retaliatory measures and negative economic consequences.

Read original article in Greek

Greek

Greece

International RelationsEconomyTariffsTrade WarHollywoodEconomic SanctionsFilm Industry

Screen AustraliaWalt DisneyNetflixUniversal PicturesAmpere AnalysisProdproFilmlaUnion Of Film CompaniesCenter For Strategic And International Studies

Donald TrumpTony BurkeChristopher LuxonJon VoightSylvester StalloneMel GibsonGavin NewsomWilliam Reinsch

What are the immediate consequences of President Trump's 100% tariff announcement on non-US films?: President Trump announced 100% tariffs on non-US films, citing a dying American film industry due to foreign incentives. Australia and New Zealand responded that they will defend their film industries against these tariffs, highlighting a potential escalation of trade disputes.
How have foreign incentives influenced the decline of film production in Hollywood, and what are the implications of this trend?: Trump's tariffs aim to counter foreign incentives attracting film production away from the US. This follows years of Hollywood productions moving abroad due to lower production costs, as evidenced by approximately half of productions over \$40 million in 2023 taking place outside the US. Australia and New Zealand's defense reflects the global competition for film production revenue projected to reach \$248 billion by 2025.
What are the potential long-term impacts of Trump's tariffs and the international response on the global film industry and broader trade relations?: Trump's action could trigger retaliatory tariffs, harming the US film industry, and deepen global trade tensions. The long-term impact depends on the specifics of the tariffs and the responses from other countries. The move underscores the increasing competition for film production and could lead to further protectionist measures globally.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately frame the issue as a defense of national film industries against Trump's protectionist policies. The article primarily uses Trump's statements to justify the narrative, giving prominence to his assertions about the 'death' of American cinema. The article also gives prominence to the negative consequences of film production moving away from Hollywood, potentially reinforcing a narrative that this shift is inherently detrimental.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual, although there is a slight bias in framing Trump's comments as the central driver of the narrative. Phrases like "Trump announced" and "Trump said" are used repeatedly, creating a focus on him as the primary actor. The article uses direct quotes, though the selection of those quotes could skew the narrative.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the US perspective and Trump's statements, giving less weight to the perspectives of Australian and New Zealand officials beyond their immediate reactions. The article also omits detailed analysis of the potential economic consequences for Hollywood studios and international film production, focusing instead on the political reactions. The economic impact of the tariffs on various stakeholders in the film industry (e.g., distributors, theaters, streaming services) is not fully explored. While acknowledging space constraints is important, deeper analysis of the economic ramifications would provide a more complete picture.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified dichotomy between the US film industry struggling and other countries offering incentives. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of the global film market, the nuances of production costs, or the potential for collaborative solutions.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Negative

Direct Relevance

The proposed 100% tariffs on non-US films threaten the Australian and New Zealand film industries, potentially leading to job losses and economic downturn in these sectors. The article highlights concerns about the impact on employment within the film industry and the potential for retaliatory tariffs that could further harm the US film industry. This directly impacts decent work and economic growth in these countries.

Jul 5, 10:09

Trump's Tariffs: Looming Re-implementation and Economic Uncertainty

President Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs, paused in the spring, are nearing re-implementation, potentially impacting US businesses and consumers significantly despite minor trade deals with the UK, China, and Vietnam; the administration's strategy of imposing and reducing tariffs causes uncertainty and potentially higher prices.

Jul 5, 04:11

US-China Trade Relations Show Signs of Improvement

Following a June 5th phone call between the heads of state, the US and China are implementing economic and trade agreements, with the US resuming some exports to China and China processing export licenses; bilateral trade, however, decreased by 8.1 percent year-on-year in the first five months of 2025, reaching $240.11 billion.

Jul 5, 10:09

USAID Dissolved: Shift to Trade-Based Foreign Policy Amidst Projected 14 Million Deaths

The US government terminated USAID's financial aid on July 1st, 2024, transferring its functions to the State Department and shifting towards a "trade instead of aid" model, potentially leading to 14 million deaths by 2030 according to a recent study, citing inefficiency and a prioritization of national interests.

Jul 5, 01:12

Trump's Trade Deal Deadline Misses Mark, Raising Global Risk

President Trump's ambitious goal of finalizing 90 trade deals within 90 days has fallen short, resulting in only three agreements and plans for imposing tariffs up to 70 percent on non-compliant countries, potentially causing global supply chain disruptions and financial market instability.