dw.com
Trump's Foreign Policy Shift Threatens Post-War World Order
Donald Trump's return to power has triggered a significant shift in US foreign policy, prioritizing improved relations with Russia over support for Ukraine and straining ties with European allies, potentially ending the existing world order established after World War II and the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- How will Trump's actions affect the economic relationship between the US and the EU?
- Trump's actions indicate a potential end to the post-World War II world order. His public confrontation with Ukrainian President Zelensky, intended to sign a rare earth metals agreement, instead involved insults, signaling a distancing from Europe and a potential realignment with Russia and China. Experts like Norbert Frei see this as the creation of a global triumvirate.
- What immediate impact will Trump's foreign policy shift have on US relations with Europe and Ukraine?
- Six weeks after Donald Trump's return to the White House, his foreign policy direction is becoming clear: a revitalization of US-Russia relations at the expense of Ukraine. This shift prioritizes differences with European allies, rather than collaboration. Statements like Trump's Wednesday declaration ("The EU was created to cheat the USA") highlight this.
- What are the long-term geopolitical implications of Trump's apparent realignment with Russia and China, and what is the likelihood of a 'Yalta 2.0' scenario?
- The economic implications of Trump's actions include the looming threat of increased tariffs on European goods, aiming to balance the trade deficit between the EU and US. This pressure, along with the potential withdrawal of military support for NATO allies and the abandonment of Ukraine, will have significant long-term implications for European security and the global balance of power. The upcoming March 12th steel and aluminum tariffs are the first step in what is expected to be an extended trade war.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Trump's presidency as a significant threat to the established world order, emphasizing negative consequences and portraying his interactions with other world leaders as confrontational and damaging. The headline, subheadings, and introductory paragraphs all contribute to this negative framing. For example, the use of phrases like "Trump okončava zapadni svjetski poredak?" immediately sets a negative tone, while the description of the Oval Office meeting as a 'svađa' (argument) reinforces the antagonistic portrayal.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language and charged terminology to depict Trump's actions and rhetoric negatively. For example, the phrase "izvrijeđali" (insulted) to describe Trump and Pence's interaction with Zelensky is emotionally charged. Other examples include using words like 'svađa'(argument) and 'prevarila' (deceived) which are emotionally loaded terms lacking neutrality. Neutral alternatives could include 'disagreement', 'negotiation' and 'dispute' respectively.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on negative interpretations of Trump's actions and statements, neglecting potentially counterbalancing viewpoints or positive interpretations of his foreign policy shifts. While sources critical of Trump are quoted extensively, voices offering alternative perspectives on his dealings with Russia and Ukraine are notably absent. This omission limits a balanced understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing Trump's actions as solely leading to the end of the post-World War II world order, ignoring the possibility of other contributing factors or alternative outcomes. The framing simplifies a complex geopolitical situation, potentially misleading readers into believing Trump's actions are the sole determinant.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Trump's potential shift in foreign policy, prioritizing relations with Moscow over support for Ukraine. This action undermines international cooperation and could destabilize the region, directly impacting peace and security. His disregard for established alliances and democratic values further weakens international institutions and norms.