lexpress.fr
Trump's Renewed Trade War with China: Escalating Tariffs and Economic Fallout
In 2018, Donald Trump initiated a trade war with China, imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum; China retaliated with its own tariffs, leading to escalating tensions that have continued into Trump's second term with new reciprocal tariffs.
- What were the key phases and escalating actions in the trade war between the US and China during Trump's first term?
- The trade war between the US and China, initiated by Trump in 2018 and continued with new measures in 2024, involved escalating tariffs and counter-tariffs, impacting various sectors. This conflict highlights broader geopolitical tensions and economic competition between the two nations.
- What were the immediate economic consequences of Donald Trump's 2018 tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum, and how did China respond?
- What they make us pay, we will make them pay back." In 2018, Donald Trump initiated a trade war with China, imposing a 25% tariff on steel and 10% on aluminum. China retaliated by raising tariffs on US imports from 8% to nearly 21%.
- How might the renewed trade conflict under Trump's second term differ from the previous one, and what are the potential long-term global economic implications?
- The renewed trade war under Trump's second term may further strain US-China relations, potentially disrupting global supply chains and impacting economic growth. China's preparedness suggests a prolonged conflict, with lasting effects on international trade dynamics.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes Trump's actions and statements as the driving force behind the trade war, using his words prominently in the introduction. The headline and introduction prioritize Trump's perspective and language, potentially shaping reader understanding to view the conflict primarily through his lens. While China's responses are mentioned, they are presented largely as reactions to Trump's initiatives.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral in terms of descriptive words. However, the repeated use of phrases like "war" and "affront" in describing the trade actions could contribute to a more combative and confrontational interpretation. The use of the term "enemy" to describe China in the first sentence sets a negative and adversarial tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Trump's actions and rhetoric, giving less detailed analysis of China's perspective and motivations beyond noting their retaliatory tariffs and economic preparations. The article mentions a "law favoring national investments" in China but doesn't elaborate on its specifics or impact. Omission of detailed Chinese perspectives could limit a reader's understanding of the complexities of the trade war.
False Dichotomy
The narrative presents a somewhat simplistic "us vs. them" framing, portraying the trade conflict as a direct confrontation between Trump and Xi Jinping, without sufficient exploration of the broader economic and geopolitical factors at play. The article tends to frame the situation as a tit-for-tat exchange of tariffs, overlooking other nuances and complexities of the trade relationship.
Sustainable Development Goals
The trade war between the US and China, characterized by tariffs and counter-tariffs, negatively impacts global trade, economic growth, and job creation in both countries. Increased import costs harm businesses and consumers, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity. The instability caused by the trade conflict discourages investment and hinders long-term economic planning.