elpais.com
Trump's Second Term: Normalization of Authoritarianism in the US
Harvard professor Steven Levitsky analyzes the implications of Donald Trump's second presidential term for American democracy, highlighting the establishment's shift from alarm to adaptation and the concerning alignment of tech CEOs and universities with the administration.
- What is the most significant impact of Donald Trump's second presidential term on American democracy, and what are the immediate consequences?
- Following Donald Trump's second inauguration as president, Steven Levitsky, a Harvard professor, observed a stark contrast in the establishment's response compared to Trump's first term. This time, the establishment is adapting to Trump's authoritarian tendencies, with figures like Elon Musk aligning themselves with the administration. Levitsky highlights this as a worrying sign of normalization.
- What are the long-term implications for American democracy of the observed normalization of authoritarian tendencies within the political and economic elites?
- Levitsky predicts continuing erosion of democratic norms due to the increasing influence of wealthy donors on universities and media. This influence compromises institutional autonomy, potentially leading to further political polarization and a weakening of checks and balances. He emphasizes the need for elites, not just the electorate, to actively defend democratic principles.
- How does the alignment of major tech CEOs and universities with Trump's administration reflect broader trends in the relationship between power, wealth, and democratic institutions?
- Levitsky's analysis connects Trump's second term to broader trends of declining trust in institutions and elites, exploited by the far-right across many countries. He notes a lack of ideological counterweight to the anti-liberal right, leaving little resistance to Trump's actions. The lack of a compelling alternative narrative from the center-left is a significant factor.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing centers heavily on the negative consequences of Trump's presidency for US democracy. The headline (not provided, but inferred from context) and opening paragraphs immediately establish a critical tone. While Levitsky's expertise is relevant, this framing might overshadow alternative interpretations of the situation. The choice to focus on Levitsky's surprise at Trump's victory and his characterization of the situation highlights this negative framing.
Language Bias
Levitsky's descriptions of Trump ('populist with empty words', 'authoritarian') and the political situation ('infernal', 'terrible, dangerous') reveal a strongly negative tone. While accurate descriptions from Levitsky's perspective, the loaded language might influence readers' interpretations. Neutral alternatives could include replacing 'infernal' with 'concerning' and softening certain descriptions to avoid overtly judgemental phrasing. The repeated use of "authoritarian" reinforces a negative framing.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Levitsky's perspective and analysis of Trump's second term and its impact on US democracy. Missing are perspectives from Trump supporters, alternative analyses of the election results, or a detailed exploration of the economic and social factors that contributed to Trump's win. While the article mentions the dissatisfaction with elites and institutions, it doesn't delve deeply into the specific grievances of different demographics, including the Latino community.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between Trump's authoritarian tendencies and the lack of a strong counter-ideological force. While it acknowledges complexities, it tends to frame the political landscape as a battle between Trump's right-wing populism and a disorganized center-left. Nuances within these broad categories are largely absent.
Gender Bias
The article doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. The focus is primarily on political analysis and doesn't involve gendered language or stereotypes. The lack of women's voices in the analysis is a potential bias by omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the rise of authoritarianism under Trump's presidency, posing a threat to democratic institutions and the rule of law. The normalization of Trump and the lack of strong opposition are highlighted as significant risks to democratic processes and stability. This directly impacts SDG 16, which aims to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.