azatutyun.am
Trump's Tariffs Trigger Sharp Decline in Asian Stock Markets
President Trump's new trade policy imposing tariffs on goods from the EU (20%) and Asian countries (over 30%) caused a sharp decline in Asian stock markets, with the MSCI Asia Pacific index experiencing its largest drop since 2008 and the Nikkei 225 plummeting nearly 20 percent. Major financial institutions, including Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, now predict a high probability of US and global recession.
- What is the immediate impact of President Trump's new trade policy on Asian stock markets?
- Bloody massacre." This is how economists describe the situation in Asian stock markets, triggered by US President Donald Trump's trade war declaration. Last week, the White House announced a new policy imposing 20 percent tariffs on goods from the EU and over 30 percent on goods from China, Vietnam, and other Asian countries. Asian-Pacific stock markets reacted severely, opening with sharp declines.
- How did major financial institutions react to Trump's trade war, and what are their predictions for the US and global economies?
- The MSCI Asia Pacific index, encompassing large and mid-cap companies from 13 Asian-Pacific countries, experienced its largest drop since 2008, losing over seven percent. The Japanese Nikkei 225 index fared worse, plummeting nearly 20 percent. This demonstrates the significant impact of Trump's tariffs on Asian economies, which are major exporters of globally traded goods.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the trade war initiated by President Trump, considering the responses of China and the EU?
- The global economic downturn predicted by Goldman Sachs (45% probability of US recession) and JPMorgan (60% probability) due to Trump's tariffs is already underway. JPMorgan revised its US growth forecast from 1.3 percent to a 0.3 percent decline. This highlights the severe and widespread consequences of the trade war, affecting not only Asia but also the US and global markets.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the situation through the lens of economic devastation caused by Trump's tariffs, using strong negative language such as "bloody massacre" in the headline and emphasizing the sharp market drops. This framing predisposes the reader to a negative view of Trump's policy, even though some might argue it's necessary or beneficial in the long run.
Language Bias
The article uses highly charged language, such as "bloody massacre" to describe the market reaction and repeatedly emphasizes the "dramatic" and "catastrophic" nature of the situation. These choices strongly influence the reader's perception. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "significant market downturn" or "substantial economic impact".
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative economic consequences of Trump's trade policies, particularly in Asia, but omits potential positive effects or counterarguments that might exist. It doesn't explore alternative perspectives on the effectiveness of tariffs or the long-term economic impact. The lack of diverse opinions limits a comprehensive understanding.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as a simple choice between accepting Trump's tariffs or facing severe economic consequences. It neglects more nuanced approaches or potential compromises. The narrative simplifies a complex situation.
Gender Bias
The article mentions several male political figures and business leaders, but women are largely absent from the narrative. Ursula von der Leyen is mentioned, but her quote is presented in a neutral way and does not highlight her gender. While no overt gender bias is apparent, the general lack of female voices is a notable omission.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes significant negative impacts on Asian and global stock markets due to US trade policies. This leads to job losses and economic downturn, directly hindering decent work and economic growth in affected regions. The substantial drops in stock indices (MSCI Asia Pacific index losing over 7%, Nikkei 225 losing approximately 20%) and predictions of recession (Goldman Sachs estimating a 45% chance, JPMorgan estimating a 60% chance) clearly indicate a negative impact on economic growth and employment.