kathimerini.gr
Trump's Trade Policies Threaten Global Economic Stability
Columbia University professor Petros Mavroeidis argues that Donald Trump's erratic trade policies are undermining the post-World War II international order, creating economic instability and necessitating a complete overhaul of the WTO framework, potentially led by the EU.
- What are the immediate consequences of Donald Trump's protectionist trade policies on the global economy?
- Donald Trump's inconsistent trade policies have severely damaged the liberal international order established after World War II, according to Columbia University professor Petros Mavroeidis. This has led to uncertainty in international trade, increasing costs for businesses and jeopardizing global economic stability.
- How has the existing WTO framework failed to address current economic challenges, and what role could the EU play in reforming it?
- Mavroeidis highlights the need for a new trade rule system involving the US, China, and Europe. The current WTO system is outdated, lacking provisions for economic security, climate change, and a modern approach to trade and development. He suggests the EU could lead in creating this new system, even without immediate US and Chinese participation.
- What are the long-term implications of the US-China trade war, and what are the potential political and social consequences in Europe and the US?
- The escalating trade war between the US and China, marked by retaliatory tariffs reaching 125%, poses a significant risk of triggering a global economic downturn. The redirection of Chinese exports to Europe could necessitate retaliatory measures from the EU, potentially leading to social unrest and unemployment within the bloc. Mavroeidis suggests that the lack of a strong social safety net in the US contributes to the public's susceptibility to protectionist rhetoric.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing strongly suggests that Trump's trade policies are solely responsible for the weakening of the liberal international order. While the author attributes significant blame to Trump, alternative factors contributing to global economic shifts are not sufficiently considered. The headline itself, while not explicitly stated in the provided text, would likely reinforce this negative framing of Trump's policies.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "asynartitis" (meaning incoherent or illogical in Greek) and "afrona poreia" (meaning unwise path in Greek) reveal some implicit negative assessment of Trump's actions. However, the overall tone strives for objectivity. The use of quotes from the interviewee largely avoids explicitly charged language, relying instead on the interviewee's own framing.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses heavily on the negative impacts of Trump's trade policies, potentially omitting or downplaying any potential benefits or positive consequences. Further, there is little discussion of the underlying economic conditions that might have contributed to the need for trade adjustments. The article also does not explore alternative perspectives on the effectiveness of multilateral trade organizations.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor scenario: either a new system of trade rules is established or the existing system collapses. The complexity of navigating the interests of major economic powers and the possibility of alternative solutions are not fully explored.
Sustainable Development Goals
Trump's trade policies destabilize the international order, challenging established institutions like the WTO and undermining global cooperation. His unilateral actions and disregard for multilateral agreements damage the rule of law and international norms.