lexpress.fr
Trump's Trade War Costs US Tourism $64 Billion
Due to Donald Trump's trade war and hostile rhetoric, US tourism plummeted in February 2025, experiencing a 2.4% drop in foreign visitors year-on-year, leading to a projected $64 billion loss and tens of thousands of job losses in the hospitality sector, primarily due to significant decreases in tourism from China (-11%), Canada (-23% decrease in car travel), and other regions.
- What is the immediate economic impact of Donald Trump's trade policies and rhetoric on US tourism?
- Donald Trump's trade war and belligerent statements have significantly impacted US tourism. In February 2025, foreign visitor numbers dropped 2.4% year-on-year, with steeper declines from China (-11%), Africa (-9%), Asia (-7%), and Central America (-6%). This resulted in a projected $64 billion loss for the US travel industry in 2025.
- How did the decline in Canadian tourism specifically contribute to the overall economic losses in the US travel industry?
- The decline is attributed to Trump's "polarizing policies and rhetoric." Tourism Economics drastically lowered its 2025 tourism growth forecast from 9% to a 5% decrease. Canadian tourism, a major source of revenue, experienced a 23% drop in car travel to the US in 2025, with further declines projected for the year.
- What are the long-term implications of this decline in international tourism for the US economy and its relationship with other countries?
- Trump's aggressive trade policies, including tariff hikes on European, Canadian, and Chinese goods, created uncertainty and fueled economic anxieties. This contributed to the tourism downturn. The situation highlights the interconnectedness of global trade and tourism, demonstrating how political rhetoric can impact economic sectors significantly. The loss of tens of thousands of hospitality jobs further underscores the severity of the situation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the story around the negative consequences of Trump's policies, highlighting the job losses and economic damage. The headline and introduction immediately establish this negative tone, setting the stage for the rest of the article. The use of words like "belliqueux" (belligerent) and "guerre commerciale" (trade war) contributes to this framing.
Language Bias
The article uses strong, negative language to describe Trump's actions and their consequences, such as "propos belliqueux" (belligerent statements), "guerre commerciale" (trade war), and "rhétorique agressive" (aggressive rhetoric). These terms are not neutral and contribute to a negative portrayal of Trump's policies. More neutral alternatives could include "strong statements," "trade disputes," and "policy changes.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative economic impact of Trump's policies on tourism, but omits any potential positive effects or counterarguments. It does not include perspectives from businesses that may have benefited or adapted to the changes, or any analysis of whether the decline is temporary or permanent. The article also doesn't explore the overall health of the US economy beyond tourism.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the situation, framing the decline in tourism as a direct and solely negative consequence of Trump's policies. It doesn't fully consider other potential factors that might have contributed to the decline, such as economic conditions in other countries or shifts in global travel preferences.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a significant decline in tourism to the US due to Trump's policies, resulting in substantial job losses in the hospitality sector and billions of dollars in economic losses. This directly impacts decent work and economic growth, particularly within the tourism industry. The decrease in tourism revenue and employment negatively affects economic growth and the livelihoods of those employed in the sector.