lemonde.fr
Trump's Trade Wars: End of Post-WWII Economic Order
On May 8th, 2025, the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day will be marked by global uncertainty as Donald Trump's protectionist policies dismantle the post-1945 economic order, creating economic instability and challenging international cooperation.
- How is Donald Trump's economic policy reshaping the global economic order established after World War II?
- On May 8th, France and Europe commemorate the 80th anniversary of Allied victory over Nazi Germany, but the celebrations will be subdued. Donald Trump's aggressive nationalism and trade wars are dismantling the post-1945 economic order built by the US, creating global economic uncertainty.
- What domestic factors within the United States contribute to Trump's protectionist policies and the resulting international instability?
- Trump's actions represent a systemic shift away from the American-led post-war economic system, characterized by multilateral institutions like the IMF and WTO. This aggressive protectionism, fueled by internal issues like deindustrialization and rising inequality within the US, threatens global stability and cooperation.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the erosion of multilateral institutions and the rise of aggressive nationalism on the global stage?
- The consequences of this shift are profound and uncertain. The breakdown of multilateral agreements could lead to further economic instability, increased geopolitical tensions, and the rise of new nationalistic movements. The future international order remains undefined.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames Trump's actions as solely disruptive and negative, emphasizing the chaos and uncertainty caused by his policies. The headline and introduction immediately set a tone of alarm, focusing on the 'end' of a post-war world order without initially presenting a balanced overview. This framing heavily influences the reader's perception of Trump's presidency and its impact.
Language Bias
The language used is often charged and negative, particularly when describing Trump's actions. Phrases like 'tapageur' (boisterous), 'haragneux' (vicious), and 'violence' contribute to a negative portrayal. The repeated use of terms like 'chaos' and 'désordre' reinforces this negative framing. More neutral alternatives could include descriptions that focus on the specific policy changes and their measurable economic impacts without value judgments.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative impacts of Trump's economic policies and their potential to disrupt the post-1945 world order. However, it omits any potential positive consequences or counterarguments that might exist. There is no mention of any possible benefits of Trump's protectionist measures, or alternative perspectives on the state of the global economy. This omission limits the reader's ability to form a complete and nuanced understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the post-1945 world order and Trump's nationalist policies, suggesting a clear break and a complete end to the former. It doesn't fully explore the complexities and nuances of the transition, the possibility of gradual change, or the existence of multiple factors shaping the current global economic landscape. The portrayal might oversimplify the situation for the reader.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights growing inequalities and the rise of nationalism as contributing factors to global instability. Donald Trump's policies, characterized by protectionism and disregard for multilateral agreements, exacerbate these inequalities, hindering progress toward a more equitable world. The resulting economic uncertainty disproportionately affects vulnerable populations and widens the gap between rich and poor.