Trump's Win: A Step Back for Democracy?

Trump's Win: A Step Back for Democracy?

corriere.it

Trump's Win: A Step Back for Democracy?

Analysis of Donald Trump's victory and the broader trend of leaders prioritizing relatability over virtue.

Italian
Italy
PoliticsLabour MarketDemocracyLeadershipPopulismVirtue
New York Times
Donald TrumpJ.d. VanceBenito MussoliniKim Jong-UnBoris JohnsonLuigi ZojaPlatoneDemostene
What is the author's opinion on the concept of "kakistocracy"?
The article uses the example of Mussolini's calculated image of sobriety to illustrate how leaders have historically maintained a facade of virtue. Trump, conversely, openly embraces his flaws, and his voters seem to applaud this approach.
What is the author's main argument about Donald Trump's victory?
Donald Trump's victory is described as clear but not necessarily a step forward for democracy. The author suggests that his willingness to disregard truth and embrace flaws has resonated with voters.
How does the article characterize the current state of political leadership?
The article critiques the current state of political leadership, suggesting that authenticity and virtue are less important than appearing relatable and accepting flaws. This shift is seen as problematic for democracy.
What is the author's overall outlook on the future of leadership and accountability?
The author concludes with a pessimistic outlook, suggesting that leaders chosen for their relatability and willingness to embrace flaws are difficult to remove, even after they fail to meet expectations. This makes it difficult to hold them accountable.
What historical figures are mentioned and how are they used to support the author's argument?
The author draws parallels between Trump's success and that of Boris Johnson, highlighting a trend where leaders flaunt their imperfections rather than striving for virtue. This approach, labeled "kakistocracy," is seen as a worrying development.