nrc.nl
Truth, Lies, and the Subjective Nature of Reality
Three recent books explore the conflict between objective truth and subjective feelings, highlighting how personal experiences and technological advancements blur the lines between truth and falsehood, impacting political decisions and personal relationships.
- How does the growing influence of subjective feelings over objective facts impact political decision-making and societal trust?
- The prevalence of subjective feelings as a basis for truth is increasing, influencing political decisions despite the existence of objective facts. This trend is evident in statements like 'people feel it this way,' which are now used to justify policies. This prioritization of feelings over facts is not limited to populists or conspiracy theorists; it's also seen in professional settings.
- What are the underlying causes of the increasing acceptance of feelings as a basis for truth in various aspects of life, from personal relationships to political discourse?
- This blurring of fact and feeling connects to broader concerns about truth and trust. The ease with which technology and platforms amplify misinformation, creating 'alternative realities', is a key factor. Scientific facts themselves are constructs subject to interpretation and biases, raising questions about the nature of truth.
- What strategies can be developed to navigate the challenges posed by the subjective nature of truth and foster more collaborative and nuanced approaches to verifying and establishing shared realities?
- The future impact of this trend will likely involve navigating a complex interplay between objective reality and subjective experiences, requiring a nuanced approach to truth and a renewed emphasis on collaborative fact-finding. The ability to distinguish between authentic and manipulative uses of subjective experience will be crucial.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the debate around truth and lies in a way that emphasizes the complexities and subjective aspects, potentially downplaying the importance of objective facts. While it mentions scientific research and the limitations of perception, the narrative centers more on personal experiences and philosophical perspectives, which might influence the reader to prioritize subjective truth.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and academic, although terms like "bluffer" and "complotdenker" (conspiracy theorist) carry a slightly negative connotation. However, these are used descriptively rather than judgmentally. Overall the language avoids overt bias.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the subjective experience of truth and falsehood, potentially omitting the perspectives of those who prioritize objective facts above all else. While acknowledging the existence of scientific evidence and the limitations of perception, it doesn't delve deeply into specific examples of scientific consensus or its potential conflicts with subjective experiences. This omission might leave the reader with a less balanced view of the importance of objective truth.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the erosion of trust in facts and the rise of subjective truths, which can undermine democratic institutions and societal cohesion. The examples of political figures like Donald Trump who spread misinformation and create alternative realities highlight the negative impact on the pursuit of justice and strong institutions. The prevalence of misinformation and the deliberate creation of false narratives threaten the ability of societies to function effectively and fairly.