Turkey and Saudi Arabia Forge Strategic Partnership Following Assad's Fall

Turkey and Saudi Arabia Forge Strategic Partnership Following Assad's Fall

abcnews.go.com

Turkey and Saudi Arabia Forge Strategic Partnership Following Assad's Fall

After the ouster of Syrian President Bashar Assad in December, Turkey and Saudi Arabia forged a strategic partnership to stabilize Syria, counter Iran's influence, and jointly lobby the U.S. to lift sanctions; this cooperation is driven by shared security concerns and economic opportunities in Syria's reconstruction.

English
United States
International RelationsMiddle EastTurkeySyriaSaudi ArabiaRegional Cooperation
Qatar University's Gulf Studies CenterCarnegie Middle East CenterThe Washington PostMuslim BrotherhoodSaudi-Turkish Coordination Council
Donald TrumpAhmad Al-SharaaMohammed Bin SalmanRecep Tayyip ErdoganJamal KhashoggiSinem CengizHesham AlghannamSalem El YamiBashar Assad
How have the differing ideologies and past conflicts between Turkey and Saudi Arabia shaped their current cooperation?
Historically, Turkey and Saudi Arabia's relationship was marked by rivalry stemming from competition for regional influence, differing approaches to political Islam, and past incidents like the Jamal Khashoggi assassination. However, their shared concerns regarding Iran's influence in Syria and their security interests in the region after Assad's fall led to a pragmatic cooperation.
What are the long-term implications of the Turkey-Saudi Arabia alliance for regional stability and the future of Syria?
The alignment between Turkey and Saudi Arabia is expected to continue, driven by mutual interests in Syria's reconstruction, countering Iran's potential resurgence, and managing regional security concerns. The revival of the Saudi-Turkish Coordination Council and potential arms deals signal a deepening partnership, though the possibility of future tensions remains.
What immediate impact did the removal of Syrian President Bashar Assad have on the relationship between Turkey and Saudi Arabia?
Following the Syrian leader Bashar Assad's removal in December, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have significantly improved their relationship, collaborating to stabilize Syria's new government and reintegrate it into the international community. This is evident in Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa's initial visits to Riyadh and Ankara, and the joint efforts of Turkey and Saudi Arabia to persuade President Trump to lift sanctions on Syria.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introductory paragraphs emphasize the positive shift in Turkey-Saudi Arabia relations, framing it as a significant development in the region. This positive framing continues throughout the article, highlighting the cooperation and shared interests, while downplaying potential drawbacks or complexities. The focus on the successful lobbying efforts to lift sanctions further reinforces this positive portrayal.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, but certain phrases like 'lightning rebel offensive' could be interpreted as subtly biased, implying a positive assessment of the rebels' actions. The repeated references to a 'thaw' in relations also carry a positive connotation. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as 'swift rebel offensive' or 'improvement' in relations.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the warming relationship between Turkey and Saudi Arabia following Assad's fall, but omits discussion of potential negative consequences or dissenting opinions regarding this new alliance. It doesn't explore potential downsides of the cooperation, such as the suppression of dissent or the consolidation of power by specific factions within Syria. Further, the article largely omits the perspective of the Syrian people and how this new partnership might affect them.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the Turkey-Saudi Arabia relationship, portraying it primarily as a shift from rivalry to cooperation. While acknowledging past tensions, it doesn't fully explore the complexities and potential for future conflict. The narrative implies a straightforward 'win-win' scenario, neglecting the possibility of competing interests or unforeseen challenges.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article features several male political figures and analysts but lacks prominent female voices beyond one researcher. While not overtly biased, a more balanced representation of genders would enhance the analysis. The article does not focus on gendered language or stereotypes.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Positive
Direct Relevance

The improved relationship between Turkey and Saudi Arabia contributes to regional stability. Their cooperation in Syria aims to prevent further conflict and instability, aligning with SDG 16's goals for peaceful and inclusive societies, strong institutions, and access to justice.