t24.com.tr
Turkey's 2024: Record High Female Deaths Highlight Gender Violence Crisis
In Turkey, 608 women died in 2024 (375 homicides, 233 suspicious deaths), the highest number in recent years according to the Stop Women Murders Platform, which blames the lack of Istanbul Convention and Lanzarote Convention implementation for the preventable deaths and plans to continue fighting for gender equality and economic justice in 2025.
- What is the overall impact of gender-based violence and economic inequality on women's lives in Turkey in 2024?
- In 2024, 608 women died in Turkey, 375 from homicides and 233 from suspicious deaths, according to the Stop Women Murders Platform. This represents the highest number of female deaths in recent years, highlighting the ongoing issue of gender-based violence. The platform attributes these deaths to the non-implementation of the Istanbul Convention.
- How does the non-implementation of the Istanbul Convention and Lanzarote Convention contribute to the high number of women's deaths and the platform's ongoing struggle?
- The high number of women's deaths in Turkey is linked to both violence and economic hardship. The lack of implementation of the Istanbul Convention and the Lanzarote Convention are cited as major contributing factors. The platform's activism, however, signals growing resistance and a strengthened fight against gender-based violence and economic inequality impacting women.
- What are the main objectives and strategies of the Stop Women Murders Platform for achieving gender equality and improving the lives of women in Turkey in the coming year?
- Looking forward, the Stop Women Murders Platform plans to continue its fight against gender-based violence and economic hardship. They aim to achieve equal pay for equal work, a minimum wage of at least 50,000 Turkish Lira, and equal distribution of housework. The platform's sustained activism and the increased involvement of young feminists are significant developments in addressing these critical issues.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the issue primarily through the lens of the platform's data and concerns. The headline (if any) and opening statements emphasize the alarming number of women's murders, thereby setting a negative and alarming tone which could be seen as manipulative. The inclusion of global examples serves to amplify the scale of the problem, but might overshadow specific details of the situation in Turkey. The focus on the negative aspects, while important, could be balanced with more positive narratives of progress and resilience.
Language Bias
The language used is emotive and alarmist, using phrases such as "en yüksek kadın cinayeti verisini" (highest record of women's murders), "önlenebilir ölüm" (preventable death), and "utanç taraf değiştirdi" (shame changed sides). While conveying the seriousness of the situation, this emotionally charged language may not allow for fully objective consideration of the issue. More neutral alternatives could include using precise statistics, avoiding hyperbole, and focusing on factual information.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the statements and perspectives of Gülsüm Kav, General Representative of the Platform to Stop Women's Murders. While it mentions the platform's data, it doesn't provide direct links to sources or methodologies for verification. Other perspectives from government officials, law enforcement, or organizations with differing viewpoints on the issue are absent. This omission limits the reader's ability to fully assess the claims made. The lack of international comparative data on women's murders also restricts the context.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the positive impact of the Istanbul Convention and the high number of women's murders. While the correlation is implied, the analysis lacks nuance regarding other contributing factors to violence against women. It also presents a false dichotomy between the struggles of women globally and the specific issues faced by women in Turkey, without properly addressing the complexities of both.
Gender Bias
The article centers on women's experiences of violence, which is appropriate given the topic. However, it is implicitly biased in that it assumes a homogenous experience for all women in Turkey. Furthermore, while mentioning men's role in violence is implied, it doesn't directly address the issue of men's responsibility or involvement in perpetrating this violence and promoting gender equality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the alarming number of femicides and suspicious deaths of women in Turkey in 2024. This directly reflects negatively on SDG 5 (Gender Equality), specifically target 5.2, which aims to eliminate all forms of violence against all women and girls. The quotes emphasize the preventable nature of these deaths and the failure to implement protective measures like the Istanbul Convention.