dw.com
Turkey's Arms Exports Surge, Imports Drop
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported that Turkey's share of global arms exports rose to 1.7 percent in 2020-2024, while its imports fell by 33 percent; the UAE was the largest buyer of Turkish arms, and Turkey supplied 11 percent of Africa's arms imports during this period.
- What is the significance of Turkey's increased arms exports and decreased imports in the global arms trade?
- Turkey increased its share of global arms exports to 1.7 percent in 2020-2024, up from 0.8 percent in 2015-2019, a 103 percent increase. This made Turkey the world's 11th largest arms exporter. Its arms imports decreased by 33 percent during the same period.
- What are the main factors contributing to the growth of Turkey's arms industry and its changing export and import patterns?
- Turkey's arms exports growth is linked to the increase in domestic arms production and regional conflicts. The UAE was the largest buyer of Turkish arms, accounting for 18 percent of its total exports. The decrease in imports reflects a shift towards self-reliance in defense.
- What are the potential geopolitical consequences of Turkey's expanding arms sales to Africa and its overall increased role in the global arms market?
- Turkey's growing role as an arms exporter, particularly in Africa (supplying 11 percent of the continent's arms imports), has significant geopolitical implications, influencing regional power dynamics and potentially impacting future conflicts. This increase, along with a decrease in imports, signals a shift in Turkey's military strategy and global influence.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report frames the increase in Turkish arms exports as a significant development, highlighting its rise in global rankings. While factual, this framing could be interpreted as positive, neglecting potential negative consequences of increased arms proliferation. The headline and introduction emphasize the quantitative growth without fully examining the context or potential consequences.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, focusing on factual data and statistics. However, phrases such as "Turkish arms industry's growth" could be interpreted as subtly positive. The description of the increase in Turkish arms exports as a "performance" could also be considered slightly loaded.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses on quantitative data regarding arms trade, potentially omitting qualitative aspects such as the human cost of conflicts or the ethical implications of arms sales. The analysis lacks discussion of the motivations behind the increase in Turkish arms exports, only stating the fact of the increase. There's also no mention of the types of weapons involved in these exports or their potential end use.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat simplistic view of the global arms trade, focusing primarily on the increase in Turkish arms exports without fully exploring the complex geopolitical factors and competing interests that influence this trade. There is no detailed discussion of alternatives to military solutions.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights a global increase in arms sales, particularly the rise of Turkey as an arms exporter. This fuels conflicts and undermines peace and security efforts. The war in Ukraine, conflicts in Africa, and conflicts in the Middle East illustrate this negative impact on global peace and security. Increased arms sales to conflict zones exacerbate violence and instability, hindering progress toward peaceful and inclusive societies.