
t24.com.tr
Turkey's High Automobile Taxes Amidst Inflation: A Hidden Tax Increase
Tax expert Ozan Bingöl criticizes Turkey's high automobile taxes, noting that the failure to update tax brackets amidst high inflation results in a hidden tax increase, forcing citizens to pay a fortune for old or unsafe vehicles or go without; between 2015-2024, 1.35 trillion Turkish lira in ÖTV was collected on motor vehicles.
- What are the immediate consequences of Turkey's high inflation on automobile taxation and its impact on citizens?
- Cars have become rolling tax offices, filling the Treasury while citizens are forced to pay a fortune for old and unsafe vehicles or go without", says tax expert Ozan Bingöl, highlighting the impact of Turkey's high inflation on car taxes. The tax rate is based on the pre-tax price, which increases with inflation, resulting in a hidden tax increase.
- How has the lack of updates to the ÖTV tax brackets since November 24, 2022, affected the overall tax burden on vehicle purchases in Turkey?
- Bingöl points out that despite high inflation and rising car prices, the tax brackets haven't been updated since November 24, 2022. This leads to an increase in both special consumption tax (ÖTV) and value-added tax (KDV). The total ÖTV collected on motor vehicles between 2015 and 2024 reached 1.35 trillion Turkish lira (approximately $3.05 trillion based on the current exchange rate).
- What are the potential long-term socio-economic implications of Turkey's high automobile taxation and the resulting limited access to safe and affordable vehicles?
- The failure to adjust tax brackets in line with inflation creates a regressive tax system, disproportionately impacting lower-income citizens. This situation may lead to social unrest or demand for government intervention to mitigate the impact of rising vehicle costs. The high tax burden on automobiles in Turkey stands out globally.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the high car tax as an unfair burden on citizens. The headline and introduction emphasize the negative impact on individuals, highlighting the expert's opinion that cars have become "wheeled tax offices." This framing, while presenting a valid concern, lacks neutrality and could evoke strong negative emotions towards the government's tax policies. The repeated use of phrases like "gizli ÖTV zammı" (hidden tax increase) further intensifies this negative framing.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language such as "gizli ÖTV zammı" (hidden tax increase), "servet ödemek" (paying a fortune), and "tekerlekli vergi dairesi" (wheeled tax office). These phrases convey a strong sense of injustice and unfairness. More neutral language could include terms like "increased car taxes," "substantial costs," and "significant tax revenue." The use of the word "yaşlı ve güvenli olmayan araçlar" (old and unsafe vehicles) implicitly frames older cars as inherently unsafe, whereas in some contexts older vehicles can be well maintained and perfectly safe.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the perspective of the tax expert, Ozan Bingöl, and doesn't include counterarguments or perspectives from the government or automotive industry regarding the necessity or impact of the car tax. While acknowledging high inflation, it omits discussion of potential government spending plans or economic policies that might justify the high tax revenue from car sales. The analysis would benefit from including data on tax revenue allocation and its impact on public services.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that citizens are forced to choose between paying exorbitant sums for older cars or going without. It ignores the possibility of alternative transportation methods, such as public transit or cycling, or the potential for government subsidies to support the purchase of safer, more affordable vehicles.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how high taxes on automobiles disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, who may be forced to drive older, less safe vehicles or forgo car ownership altogether. This exacerbates existing inequalities in access to transportation and mobility.