dw.com
Turkey's Press Freedom Plummets to 159th in 2025 RSF Index
Turkey's press freedom ranking fell to 159th out of 180 countries in the 2025 RSF World Press Freedom Index, a one-spot drop from 2024, due to increased judicial control measures, economic pressures, and media consolidation, highlighting systemic challenges to freedom of the press.
- What is the impact of Turkey's declining press freedom ranking on its domestic and international standing?
- According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF)'s 2025 World Press Freedom Index, Turkey ranks 159th out of 180 countries, dropping one position compared to last year. This decline follows a temporary seven-spot improvement in 2024 due to larger drops in other countries, but Turkey remains in the "very serious" category.
- How do economic factors, particularly the influence of technology giants and government policies, contribute to Turkey's declining press freedom?
- Turkey's press freedom decline is attributed to worsening national conditions. This systematic limitation on press freedom is evident not only in the number of jailed journalists (18 as of March) but also in the increasing use of judicial control measures, affecting numerous prominent journalists, including Timur Soykan and Fatih Altaylı, restricting their ability to work freely.
- What are the long-term implications of the systematic suppression of press freedom in Turkey, and what measures could be taken to improve the situation?
- The widespread use of judicial control in Turkey, including travel bans and house arrest, functions as a de facto criminal penalty, impacting nearly every journalist facing investigation. This trend, coupled with economic pressures and media consolidation, creates a climate where critical journalism is increasingly stifled and the media is susceptible to becoming monolithic.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The report's framing emphasizes the negative aspects of press freedom in Turkey, using strong language such as "very serious" and highlighting the continuous decline in ranking over the years. The headline and introduction immediately set a negative tone, focusing on the drop in ranking and the harsh conditions for journalists. This framing could lead readers to perceive the situation as far worse than it might be, neglecting any potential positive developments.
Language Bias
The report uses strong and emotive language, such as "very serious," "serious decline," and "systematically restricted." While accurately reflecting the severity of the situation, this language could be perceived as biased and lacks neutrality. More neutral alternatives might include phrases such as "significant challenges," "substantial decrease," and "substantially limited.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the decline in press freedom in Turkey and the challenges faced by journalists, but it omits discussion of potential positive developments or government initiatives aimed at improving press freedom. While it mentions the economic challenges faced by media outlets globally, it does not delve into potential solutions or alternative funding models that could support independent journalism in Turkey. The lack of this context might leave the reader with a one-sided and overly pessimistic view.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between a completely free press and a severely restricted one, neglecting the nuances of the situation in Turkey and the varying degrees of press freedom experienced by different media outlets. The focus on the overall ranking and negative trends overshadows the existence of any media outlets that may operate with a degree of independence.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights a significant decline in press freedom in Turkey, ranking 159th out of 180 countries. This demonstrates a weakening of institutions responsible for upholding freedom of speech and the rule of law. The increasing use of judicial control measures against journalists, including travel bans and house arrest, further restricts their ability to work freely and contributes to a climate of fear and self-censorship. This directly undermines the principles of justice and strong institutions.