dw.com
Turkish Arms Sales Surge 24% in 2023
According to SIPRI, Turkish arms manufacturers Aselsan, Baykar, and TUSAŞ saw a combined revenue increase of 24% to $6 billion in 2023, driven by domestic demand and exports related to the war in Ukraine.
- What is the significance of the increase in Turkish arms manufacturers' global market share?
- Turkish companies increased their share of the global arms trade in 2023, with Aselsan, Baykar, and TUSAŞ seeing a combined revenue increase of 24% to $6 billion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Baykar's revenue surged by 25% to $1.9 billion, driven largely by exports, while TUSAŞ saw a 45% increase, reaching $1.7 billion. Aselsan's revenue grew by 12% to $2.4 billion.
- How did the war in Ukraine and domestic demand in Turkey contribute to the growth of Turkish arms sales?
- This growth is linked to increased domestic demand in Turkey and the war in Ukraine, reflecting Turkey's long-standing goal of self-sufficiency in defense. Baykar's drones were extensively used in Ukraine, leading to significant export revenue. The increase in sales by Turkish arms manufacturers highlights the growing global demand for defense technology and Turkey's increasing role in this market.
- What are the potential long-term implications of Turkey's growing role in the global arms trade, considering the increasing demand for drones and other advanced technologies?
- The rising prominence of Turkish arms manufacturers in the global market signals a shift in the geopolitical landscape. The success of Baykar, particularly its drone exports, suggests a growing reliance on unmanned aerial vehicles in modern warfare. This trend is likely to continue, shaping future conflicts and the arms trade.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely positive towards the growth of the Turkish arms industry. The article highlights the significant increase in revenue and the rise in ranking of Turkish companies in the SIPRI list. While it mentions the use of Baykar drones in Ukraine, it does so without substantial critical analysis of the ethical or geopolitical implications. The headline, if there was one, likely would have emphasized the growth of Turkish arms sales.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual, presenting the information from the SIPRI report. However, the phrasing of certain sentences, such as describing the significant increase in revenue as "growth", might be considered slightly positive, favoring the narrative of success for the Turkish arms industry.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the growth of Turkish arms manufacturers without providing a comparative analysis of the ethical implications of this growth in relation to regional conflicts or global arms control efforts. The lack of discussion on the human cost of weapon sales, or the potential for these weapons to be used in violation of international law, constitutes a significant omission.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the factors driving the growth of Turkish arms sales, primarily attributing it to internal demand and the war in Ukraine. While these are significant factors, a more nuanced analysis could explore other contributing elements, such as geopolitical shifts, changing alliances, and competition within the global arms market.
Sustainable Development Goals
The report highlights the increase in arms sales by Turkish companies, which contributes to the global arms trade and potentially fuels conflicts. This negatively impacts efforts towards peace, justice, and strong institutions, as increased arms sales can exacerbate conflicts and undermine international security.