lemonde.fr
UK, Canada, Australia, and Portugal Recognize State of Palestine
On September 21, 2025, the UK, Canada, Australia, and Portugal recognized the State of Palestine, bringing the total number of recognizing countries to 152, a move intended to reinvigorate the two-state solution in the Middle East; France, Belgium, Malta, Luxembourg, and San Marino are expected to follow suit on September 22nd.
- What is the broader context of these recent recognitions of Palestine?
- These recognitions are part of a long-standing effort to achieve a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The timing is significant, following a deadly war in Gaza in 2024 and amid ongoing international efforts to mediate peace. While the EU remains divided, several member states have already recognized Palestine.
- What are the potential future implications of this increased international recognition of Palestine?
- Increased international recognition could strengthen the Palestinian Authority's position in negotiations with Israel and potentially lead to further diplomatic initiatives towards a two-state solution. However, the impact remains uncertain given the complexities of the conflict and the lack of consensus among major global powers.
- What is the immediate impact of the UK, Canada, Australia, and Portugal recognizing the State of Palestine?
- Their recognition increases the number of countries recognizing Palestine to 152, signaling increased international support for Palestinian statehood and potentially influencing the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This follows similar actions by other countries in 2024, aiming to revive the two-state solution.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a largely neutral account of the increasing number of countries recognizing Palestine as a state. While it highlights the historical context and the recent wave of recognitions, it avoids overtly framing the issue as either pro- or anti-Palestinian. However, the emphasis on the number of countries recognizing Palestine (reaching 152) might subtly suggest a growing international consensus, potentially overlooking dissenting viewpoints or complexities within the issue.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "historical decisions" are descriptive but not explicitly loaded. There's no obvious use of emotionally charged language or biased descriptors. The reference to the "war in Gaza" is factual, although it could be argued that a more precise description of the conflict might be beneficial.
Bias by Omission
The article could benefit from including perspectives from countries that have *not* recognized Palestine. While mentioning the EU's division on the issue, it doesn't provide details on the reasons behind the opposition or the arguments presented by those countries. Additionally, the article might benefit from including counterarguments to the claim of growing international consensus.
Sustainable Development Goals
The recognition of Palestine by several countries, including the UK, Canada, Australia, and Portugal, is a step towards fostering peace and justice in the Middle East. This action could contribute to a two-state solution and potentially resolve the long-standing conflict. Increased international recognition of Palestine's statehood may encourage further dialogue and negotiations, thus improving prospects for lasting peace and stronger institutions in the region.