theguardian.com
UK risks squandering chance to protect children
A leading expert warns that the UK government is squandering a chance to protect children by not implementing mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse.
English
United Kingdom
Human Rights ViolationsHealthUkLegislationGovernment PolicyChild AbuseReformSocial Issue
IicsaScottish Parliament’s Cross-Party Group On Adult Survivors Of Childhood Sexual AbuseEdinburgh Academy
Alexis JayJess PhillipsFulton MacgregorGiles Moffatt
- What was Prof Jay's most important recommendation, and why is it considered crucial?
- Prof Jay's key recommendation was to make it a criminal offense for those in positions of trust to not report child sexual abuse allegations; she considers this crucial for safeguarding children.
- What are the main arguments for and against mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse?
- Critics argue that mandatory reporting may lead to over-reporting, burdening services and causing distress to victims, while supporters cite international evidence and survivor support for the reform.
- What is the main concern raised by Prof Alexis Jay regarding child protection in the UK?
- The UK government's failure to implement mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse is a missed opportunity to protect children, according to Prof Alexis Jay, former chair of the IICSA.
- How might the situation in England and Wales affect child protection efforts in Scotland?
- The lack of mandatory reporting in England and Wales might hinder similar actions in Scotland, and the absence of such laws makes the UK an outlier internationally.
- What is the perspective of Giles Moffatt on the ongoing debate about mandatory reporting?
- Giles Moffatt, co-founder of a support group for abuse survivors, finds the ongoing debate about mandatory reporting absurd, emphasizing the need for immediate intervention to protect children.