dw.com
Ukraine Charges Former MP Novinsky with Treason, Seizes $377 Million in Assets
Ukraine's SBU and DBR charged former MP Vadym Novinsky in absentia with treason and inciting religious hatred for disseminating Kremlin propaganda, using religious communities in the EU to discredit Ukraine, and collaborating with Patriarch Kirill; they seized over $377 million USD in his assets.
- What specific actions by Vadym Novinsky constitute treason and religious hatred, and what immediate consequences have resulted?
- Vadym Novinsky, a former Ukrainian MP and oligarch with ties to banned political parties, has been charged in absentia with treason and inciting religious hatred. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the State Bureau of Investigations (DBR) documented his Kremlin propaganda dissemination and using religious communities in the EU to discredit Ukraine.
- How did Novinsky's alleged connections with the Russian Orthodox Church facilitate the spread of Russian propaganda, and what role did religious communities play?
- Novinsky's actions, including using charter flights to escape to the EU after the full-scale invasion, directly aided Russia's war effort. His alleged collaboration with Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church involved leveraging religious communities for propaganda, highlighting the intersection of religious and political influence in the conflict.
- What are the broader implications of this case for combating Russian influence in Ukraine and the potential for future legal action against other suspected collaborators?
- The case against Novinsky underscores the Ukrainian government's efforts to combat internal collaborators and Russian influence. The seizure of his assets, totaling over 14 billion hryvnias (approximately $377 million USD), demonstrates a strategy of financial pressure to combat the war effort and punish those who support it. Further investigations may uncover additional assets and collaborators.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing leans towards portraying Novinsky negatively. The headline and lead emphasize the accusations of treason and incitement, while the details regarding his humanitarian work and religious service are presented later and in less detail. The emphasis on the SBU and DBR investigations and the seized assets might prime the reader to view Novinsky unfavorably. The selection of details enhances this negative portrayal.
Language Bias
The language used is mostly neutral and factual, however, phrases like "undermining activities" and "working in the interests of the RF" carry negative connotations. The use of "Kremlin narratives" also implies a negative bias. More neutral alternatives could include "actions against national interests" and "communication with the Russian Orthodox Church."
Bias by Omission
The article omits the specific details of the alleged Kremlin narratives spread by Vadym Novinsky. While it mentions the narratives, it doesn't provide direct quotes or summaries, making it difficult to assess the extent and nature of the alleged propaganda. This omission limits the reader's ability to fully evaluate the accusations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The investigation and charges against Vadym Novinsky for treason and inciting religious hatred contribute to upholding the rule of law and accountability for actions that undermine national security and social harmony. The seizure of his assets further aims to prevent the use of illicit funds to destabilize the country. This aligns with SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.