fr.euronews.com
Ukraine Seeks Lasting Peace in Upcoming Russia Talks
Ukrainian President Zelensky will meet with U.S. officials at the Munich Security Conference to discuss peace negotiations to end the war with Russia; Ukraine seeks lasting peace, not a temporary ceasefire, fearing Russia will regroup and restart the conflict after past broken agreements.
- What are the primary goals and concerns of Ukraine entering peace negotiations with Russia, given their past experiences and current military situation?
- Ukraine's President Zelensky will meet with U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the Munich Security Conference, potentially initiating peace negotiations to end the Russo-Ukrainian war. However, Ukrainian expectations are cautious, prioritizing a lasting peace ensuring Russia doesn't regroup and restart the conflict. This follows another Russian ballistic missile attack on Kyiv.
- What are the potential roles of the U.S. and the EU in guaranteeing a lasting peace, and what are the risks of insufficient involvement or conflicting interests?
- The upcoming negotiations face challenges including potential territorial concessions and the need for strong security guarantees from the U.S. and EU. Ukraine's control of some Russian territory near Kursk might strengthen its negotiating position, while maintaining allied unity is crucial to deterring Russia's divide-and-conquer strategy. The absence of the U.S. in past negotiations (Minsk agreements) is seen as a major factor.
- How do the historical contexts of the 2014 invasion, the Minsk agreements, and the Budapest Memorandum influence Ukraine's approach to current peace negotiations?
- Ukraine seeks a sustainable peace, not a temporary ceasefire, fearing Russia will rebuild its military and resume aggression. Their concerns stem from past experiences, referencing the 2014 invasion and the Minsk agreements which were not honored by Russia. The Ukrainians also highlight the militarization of Ukrainian children in occupied territories.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the situation strongly from the Ukrainian perspective, emphasizing their losses, desire for justice, and concerns about potential territorial concessions. Headlines or a strong introduction emphasizing the upcoming meeting between Ukrainian and US officials could further reinforce this perspective, potentially shaping reader sympathy and understanding of the conflict.
Language Bias
The article uses strong emotional language when describing the situation, particularly in the quotes from Evheniia Kravchuk. Phrases like "massacres," "killing Ukrainians," and descriptions of the militarization of Ukrainian children in occupied territories, are emotionally charged. While reflecting genuine concerns, these terms might not be completely neutral and could influence reader perception. More neutral alternatives could include phrases such as "casualties," "conflict," and "military training" in some cases.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Ukrainian perspectives and concerns, potentially omitting or downplaying Russian viewpoints and justifications for their actions. While acknowledging limitations of space, the lack of direct Russian perspectives limits a complete understanding of the conflict's complexities. The article also doesn't extensively detail the potential consequences of prolonged conflict for global stability or the economic implications of various peace scenarios.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy between a "lasting peace" and a ceasefire leading to renewed conflict. While this reflects Ukrainian concerns, it simplifies the range of possible outcomes. Negotiated settlements with transitional measures and gradual demilitarization are not fully explored as viable alternatives.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the potential for negotiations to end the war in Ukraine, which directly relates to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). A peaceful resolution would promote justice, strengthen institutions, and reduce violence. The discussions around ensuring a lasting peace, avoiding concessions that could embolden Russia, and securing guarantees from the US and EU are all crucial aspects of achieving sustainable peace and justice.