dw.com
Ukraine War: Landmine Casualties Surge Tenfold
The Ukraine conflict witnessed a tenfold surge in landmine casualties in 2022 (608 reported incidents), with both sides using landmines extensively, highlighting the Ottawa Treaty's limitations as anti-vehicle mines remain legal and cause significant civilian harm (85% of casualties).
- What is the immediate impact of the increased landmine use in the Ukraine conflict?
- The Ukraine conflict has seen a tenfold increase in landmine casualties in 2022, reaching 608 reported incidents. Both sides utilize landmines extensively, with Russia employing them to hinder Ukrainian offensives and Ukraine using them defensively. This widespread use significantly impacts civilian populations, as 85% of casualties are non-combatants.
- How does the distinction between anti-personnel and anti-vehicle mines affect the effectiveness of the Ottawa Treaty?
- The escalating use of landmines in Ukraine highlights a critical flaw in the 1999 Ottawa Treaty, which bans anti-personnel mines but not anti-tank or anti-vehicle mines. This loophole allows for the continued devastating impact of landmines, disproportionately affecting civilians. The conflict demonstrates how readily available and inexpensive landmines are, even decades after deployment.
- What are the long-term humanitarian and economic consequences of widespread landmine contamination, and what strategies can effectively address these challenges?
- Looking ahead, the massive landmine contamination in Ukraine and other conflict zones necessitates significant international cooperation for mine clearance. The high cost and complexity of this task, coupled with the ongoing use of landmines, create long-term humanitarian and economic challenges. The success of mine clearance efforts in countries like Mozambique offers a model for future interventions but requires substantial financial and logistical support.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the humanitarian crisis caused by landmines, particularly in Ukraine, which is understandable given the current conflict. However, this focus could unintentionally overshadow the broader global issue of landmine contamination and the persistent challenges in many other conflict zones. The headline (if any) would likely further influence this framing. The repeated use of strong words like "explosive," "thousandfold deadly," and "death bringers" contributes to a sense of urgency and alarm, which, while effective in drawing attention to the issue, might also exaggerate the problem or oversimplify its complexities.
Language Bias
The article uses emotionally charged language, such as "death bringers" and descriptions of mines as "explosive" and "thousandfold deadly." While aiming to highlight the severity, this loaded language could be considered biased. More neutral alternatives could include phrases like "lethal weapons," "highly destructive devices," or "weapons causing significant casualties." The repeated emphasis on the high number of casualties creates a sense of alarm and could be toned down slightly to maintain objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the use of landmines in the Ukraine conflict and mentions other countries affected by landmines only briefly. While it mentions the high number of civilian casualties, a deeper exploration of the socio-economic impact on affected communities and the long-term consequences of landmine contamination in various regions is missing. The specific challenges faced by different countries in clearing landmines, beyond financial constraints, are not detailed. There is no mention of the specific types of landmines used by different countries and their varying lethality.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the Ottawa Convention's success in banning anti-personnel mines and the continued use of landmines in various conflicts. It highlights the number of states that have signed the treaty versus those that haven't, without exploring the nuances of why some countries haven't joined or the complexities of enforcement. The article implicitly suggests a clear-cut solution to the landmine problem, downplaying the challenges of implementation and enforcement, and the political complexities involved.
Gender Bias
The article features several male experts (e.g., Oberst a.D. Wolfgang Richter) while mentioning only one female expert (Eva Maria Fischer) from Handicap International. While this doesn't necessarily indicate a strong gender bias, providing more balanced representation from female experts in different fields related to landmines would improve the article. The article does not focus on gendered impacts of landmines, which could be explored further.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the devastating impact of landmines in the ongoing Ukraine conflict and other regions, causing numerous casualties and hindering peacebuilding efforts. The use of landmines, especially anti-personnel mines, violates international treaties and undermines efforts towards lasting peace and security. The increase in casualties, particularly among civilians, demonstrates a setback in achieving SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions).