dw.com
Ukraine's Inconsistent Approach to Regulating Esotericism and Pornography
The Ukrainian Ministry of Culture refuses to remove esotericists and psychics from national TV, while parliament debates decriminalizing pornography, reflecting inconsistent regulatory approaches to controversial topics amidst wartime.
- How does the parliament's consideration of decriminalizing pornography relate to the government's inaction on regulating the spread of misinformation by esoteric practitioners on national television?
- This inaction regarding unproven medical advice and esoteric practices on national television contrasts with the parliament's consideration of decriminalizing pornography, highlighting a potential inconsistency in regulating controversial topics. The decision to allow or ban such content appears driven by political expediency rather than consistent principle.
- What are the immediate implications of the Ukrainian government's refusal to regulate the presence of esotericists and psychics on national television, particularly concerning public health and national security?
- Ukraine's Ministry of Culture and Strategic Communications has declined to address the frequent appearances of esotericists, numerologists, and psychics on the national telethon "United News," citing an inability to control content. Simultaneously, parliament is debating the decriminalization of pornography production and distribution.
- What are the long-term societal consequences of the Ukrainian government's implicit endorsement of unproven practices and potentially harmful advice disseminated through national media, especially during wartime?
- The government's tolerance of these practices, coupled with a past lawmaker's attempt to legalize esoteric services, suggests a future where such practices are normalized. The potential impact is the erosion of trust in verifiable expertise, benefiting those who exploit public anxieties during wartime.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and introduction immediately establish a critical stance towards the government's inaction regarding esoterics on television. The article consistently frames the esoterics' presence as negative, emphasizing potential harm and the lack of government control. This framing guides the reader towards a negative interpretation and overlooks potential mitigating factors.
Language Bias
The author uses loaded language such as "zguubni" (harmful) and "shakhrai" (swindler), creating a negative connotation toward esoterics. Phrases like "goldeni chasi" (golden times) are used sarcastically to further emphasize the negative view. More neutral terms could be employed for greater objectivity.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the presence of esoterics on Ukrainian television and the government's inaction, but omits discussion of the potential benefits or alternative perspectives on the role of these figures during wartime. It does not explore the views of those who believe the esoterics provide comfort or support to the population. The lack of this counterpoint creates an unbalanced narrative.
False Dichotomy
The article sets up a false dichotomy between the government's allowance of esoterics on television and its consideration of decriminalizing pornography. It implies these are equivalent issues, ignoring the fundamental differences in their nature and societal impact. This framing is manipulative.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the Ukrainian government's inaction against the spread of pseudoscience and misinformation on national television. This lack of regulation allows for the dissemination of inaccurate and potentially harmful information, hindering the public's ability to critically assess information and make informed decisions. This undermines the goal of promoting quality education and critical thinking skills, which are essential for informed decision-making and societal progress. The promotion of unsubstantiated claims, especially in health and national security matters, directly contradicts the principles of evidence-based education and informed citizenship.