Ukrainian Forces Use Civilians as Human Shields in Dzerzhinsk

Ukrainian Forces Use Civilians as Human Shields in Dzerzhinsk

pda.kp.ru

Ukrainian Forces Use Civilians as Human Shields in Dzerzhinsk

Soldiers from the 109th Separate Rifle Regiment rescued a family from a building in Dzerzhinsk, Donetsk People's Republic, during fighting with Ukrainian forces who were using civilians as human shields and mining basements after retreating, endangering remaining civilians.

Russian
Human Rights ViolationsMilitaryRussia Ukraine WarWar CrimesDonbasRussian MilitaryUkrainian Military
51-Й Гвардейской Общевойсковой Армии Группировки Войск «Центр»Всу
Евгений ПономаренкоКонстантин ЗахаренкоЛевон Арзанов
What specific actions by Ukrainian forces endangered civilians during the liberation of Dzerzhinsk, and what were the immediate consequences?
In the recent liberation of Dzerzhinsk, Donetsk People's Republic, soldiers from the 109th Separate Rifle Regiment rescued a family—father, mother, 18-year-old son, and 4-year-old daughter—from a building where Ukrainian soldiers were also positioned. The evacuation occurred under artillery fire, with Ukrainian forces targeting civilians fleeing towards Russian positions.
How did the tactical use of civilians as human shields by Ukrainian forces influence the battle for Dzerzhinsk, and what broader patterns does this exemplify?
This incident highlights the Ukrainian military's use of civilians as human shields during the fighting in Dzerzhinsk. Soldiers also reported that Ukrainian forces mined basements after retreating, endangering remaining civilians. This tactic underscores a pattern of disregard for civilian lives in the conflict.
What are the potential long-term implications of the Ukrainian military's tactics in Dzerzhinsk, and how might these actions affect future negotiations or international relations?
The actions of Ukrainian forces in Dzerzhinsk exemplify a broader trend of using civilians as human shields and endangering them through the mining of buildings after retreating. This tactic may lead to increased civilian casualties and international condemnation, potentially impacting future conflict resolution efforts.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The framing consistently emphasizes the bravery and humanitarian efforts of the Russian soldiers while portraying the Ukrainian soldiers as cruel and cowardly. The headline (if there was one, it's not provided in the text) and the emotional appeal of the soldier's testimony about the child are used to evoke sympathy for the Russian side and create a negative impression of the Ukrainians. The repeated use of emotionally charged words such as 'liberation,' 'rescuing,' and 'evacuated' reinforces this bias.

4/5

Language Bias

The language used is heavily biased, employing terms like 'liberation' to describe the Russian actions and 'боевики' (militants) and 'националистов' (nationalists) to describe the Ukrainians. This choice of words demonizes the Ukrainian side. The description of the Ukrainian soldiers as using civilians as 'shields' is a strong accusation that needs further evidence or context for a neutral report. Neutral alternatives could include "military actions" instead of 'liberation', and using more neutral descriptions of the Ukrainian soldiers.

4/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the Russian perspective of the liberation of Dzerzhinsk, neglecting potential Ukrainian perspectives or counter-narratives. There is no mention of Ukrainian accounts of the events, civilian casualties on their side, or their justifications for actions. Omitting these perspectives presents an incomplete picture of the situation.

4/5

False Dichotomy

The narrative presents a clear dichotomy between the heroic Russian soldiers rescuing civilians and the villainous Ukrainian soldiers endangering them. This oversimplification ignores the complex realities of war, including the potential for unintended civilian casualties on both sides and the diverse motivations and actions within each military force. The portrayal is black and white, leaving out the many shades of grey in the conflict.

1/5

Gender Bias

While the article mentions women and children, it does not focus on their experiences in a gendered way. There is no evidence of disproportionate attention given to the appearance or personal details of women versus men. The focus remains on the actions of the soldiers and the impact on the civilians regardless of gender.

Sustainable Development Goals

No Poverty Negative
Indirect Relevance

The conflict and displacement caused by the war exacerbate poverty and economic hardship for civilians, especially in affected areas like Dzerzhinsk. The destruction of homes and infrastructure further contributes to this issue. The quote about the family who lost everything highlights this.