lexpress.fr
UN Ocean Conference: Calls for Multilateralism Amidst Concerns of Ocean Exploitation
The UN Ocean Conference in Nice, from June 9th-13th, saw leaders call for a ban on bottom trawling, stronger marine protections, and multilateralism to counter unilateral exploitation of ocean resources, as exemplified by US deep-sea mining plans.
- What are the most significant immediate actions proposed at the UN Ocean Conference to protect ocean resources?
- The UN Ocean Conference, co-hosted by France and Costa Rica, opened in Nice on June 9th, with calls to ban bottom trawling and strengthen protected marine areas. The summit, lasting until June 13th, will include 63 heads of state and government. Key declarations included Macron's statement that the deep seas, Greenland, and Antarctica are "not for sale," and Guterres' concern that the seabed could become a "Wild West.
- How do differing national approaches to deep-sea mining and bottom trawling reflect broader geopolitical and environmental concerns?
- Several nations voiced concerns about the exploitation of ocean resources. Brazil's president denounced unilateralism, implicitly criticizing US plans for deep-sea mining. The UK announced plans to expand its ban on bottom trawling to over half of its protected marine areas, covering 30,000 square kilometers.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of insufficient international cooperation on ocean governance, considering the increasing pressure on marine resources?
- This conference highlights growing international tensions over ocean governance. The contrasting approaches to deep-sea mining and bottom trawling reveal a struggle between environmental protection and resource exploitation. Future implications include potential conflicts over resource access and the need for stronger international regulations.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article emphasizes the urgency and importance of protecting the oceans from exploitation, particularly through the strong statements from world leaders like Macron, Guterres, and Lula. The headline and introduction focus on calls for action and the threats to marine environments. This framing could potentially influence the reader to favor stricter regulations and protection measures, potentially overshadowing other important considerations.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although some phrasing could be considered slightly loaded. For example, describing bottom trawling as "destructive" and the ocean as "in ebullition" (boiling) conveys a negative connotation. More neutral alternatives could be used, such as "damaging" or "experiencing significant warming" respectively.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the calls to ban bottom trawling and protect marine areas, and the statements of various world leaders. However, it omits discussion of potential economic impacts on fishing communities that depend on bottom trawling, as well as alternative sustainable fishing practices that could mitigate the environmental damage. The lack of these perspectives could limit the reader's understanding of the complexities of the issue and the potential challenges of implementing a ban.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified eitheor framing by strongly emphasizing the need to ban bottom trawling and protect marine areas, without fully exploring the nuances and trade-offs involved. While the environmental damage caused by bottom trawling is highlighted, the article doesn't extensively discuss potential solutions that balance environmental protection with the economic needs of fishing communities.
Sustainable Development Goals
The UN Ocean Conference in Nice focuses on protecting marine ecosystems. Discussions include banning bottom trawling, a destructive fishing practice, and expanding protected marine areas. These actions directly contribute to SDG 14 (Life Below Water) by conserving and sustainably using the oceans, seas, and marine resources.