UN to Negotiate Treaty on Crimes Against Humanity

UN to Negotiate Treaty on Crimes Against Humanity

apnews.com

UN to Negotiate Treaty on Crimes Against Humanity

A UN committee adopted a resolution to create a treaty to prevent and punish crimes against humanity, overcoming initial Russian objections.

English
United States
International RelationsHuman Rights ViolationsRussiaHuman RightsInternational LawCrimes Against HumanityUnited NationsTreaty Negotiations
United Nations (Un)General AssemblyHuman Rights WatchInternational Criminal Court (Icc)Global Justice CenterAmnesty International
Richard DickerMaria ZabolotskayaKelly AdamsAgnes CallamardAmadou Jaiteh
What were Russia's initial objections, and how did they influence the outcome of the negotiations?
The resolution, supported by a consensus of UN nations, sets a timetable for treaty negotiations in 2026-2029, aiming to address the gap in international law regarding crimes against humanity.
What is the significance of the UN General Assembly committee's resolution on crimes against humanity?
The UN General Assembly committee adopted a resolution to start negotiations for a treaty on preventing and punishing crimes against humanity. This followed Russia's withdrawal of amendments that would have blocked the effort.
What are the potential challenges to the successful negotiation and implementation of the proposed treaty on crimes against humanity?
While the timeline extends to 2029, the agreement itself marks a significant step forward in international justice, as it aims to provide accountability for such crimes worldwide.

Cognitive Concepts

3/5

Framing Bias

The article is framed around the success story of the resolution's adoption. This positive framing emphasizes the hope and potential of a new treaty while potentially downplaying challenges ahead in the negotiation process.

2/5

Language Bias

The article uses mostly neutral language, but the descriptions of the resolution's adoption as a 'historic achievement' and an 'historic breakthrough' carry positive connotations that could subtly influence readers.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the positive outcome of the resolution's adoption, mentioning Russia's initial objections but downplaying any potential long-term issues or resistance that might hinder the treaty's implementation. It also does not extensively detail the specifics of the proposed amendments.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplified narrative of 'success' versus 'failure' in the negotiations. While Russia's initial objections posed a real risk to the treaty's progress, the framing might overshadow the complexities and potential challenges of the coming negotiations.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Very Positive
Direct Relevance

The resolution and subsequent negotiations aim to strengthen international justice systems and mechanisms for accountability, directly contributing to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions). The creation of a treaty specifically addressing crimes against humanity will help enhance the prevention and punishment of these crimes, promoting peace and justice globally.