
pt.euronews.com
Underrepresentation of Women in Conflict Resolution Hinders Peace Efforts
The low participation of women in global conflict resolution, only 16% in UN-led peace processes in 2022, negatively impacts peace agreement durability and effectiveness; this is despite research showing that inclusive processes yield better outcomes. Ukraine's experience highlights the need for addressing gender-specific needs in the military and diplomacy.
- What are the direct consequences of the significant underrepresentation of women in global conflict resolution processes?
- The underrepresentation of women in conflict resolution globally leads to the neglect of crucial topics during peace talks, as evidenced by only 16% of negotiators in UN-led peace processes in 2022 being women—a 7% decrease from 2020. This lack of female participation directly impacts the durability and effectiveness of peace agreements. Research consistently shows that inclusive peace processes yield better outcomes.
- How do systemic factors, including societal norms and limited opportunities, contribute to the gender imbalance in peace negotiations and diplomacy?
- This gender imbalance in peace processes stems from systemic issues, including the lack of opportunities for women in leadership roles during peacetime. The underrepresentation of women in diplomacy and high-level positions, such as only five of 27 EU member states having female foreign ministers, perpetuates this cycle. Even in Ukraine, despite commendable efforts to address conflict-related sexual violence, women lack proper combat uniforms, hindering their effectiveness.
- What proactive steps during peacetime are crucial to increase women's participation in conflict resolution, and how can these efforts ensure lasting changes in gender roles within the broader context of peacebuilding?
- While wartime may paradoxically accelerate women's roles, lasting change requires proactive measures during peacetime. Creating opportunities for women in leadership positions within their societies is essential for increasing their participation in diplomacy and conflict resolution. The focus should be on changing mindsets and demonstrating the enhanced efficiency and effectiveness of inclusive decision-making processes.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue as a problem of underrepresentation of women in peace processes, highlighting the negative consequences of their exclusion and the positive impact of their inclusion. The use of expert quotes from Irene Fellin strengthens this framing. The headline, if included, would likely further emphasize this perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the lack of women in conflict resolution, but it could benefit from including data on the representation of women in other peace-building roles (e.g., humanitarian aid, civil society organizations). Additionally, while the article mentions the positive impact of women's inclusion, it could strengthen its analysis by providing specific examples of peace agreements that were more successful due to women's participation. The article also omits discussion of the potential barriers to increased female participation, such as cultural norms or safety concerns.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the underrepresentation of women in conflict resolution, peace negotiations, and high-level diplomatic roles. This lack of inclusivity hinders the achievement of sustainable peace and security, and negatively impacts the effectiveness of conflict resolution efforts. The article cites statistics showing that women comprised only 16% of negotiators in UN-led peace processes in 2022, a decrease from 2020. The limited participation of women results in overlooking crucial perspectives and needs, especially concerning the protection of women and children, access to healthcare, and food security.