theglobeandmail.com
UNESCO Designates Sake as Intangible Cultural Heritage
UNESCO inscribed sake, a Japanese rice wine with a history dating back to at least the 11th century, onto its intangible cultural heritage list on Wednesday, aiming to boost its global image and the Japanese export economy.
- What is the significance of UNESCO's recognition of sake as an intangible cultural heritage?
- UNESCO recognized sake, a Japanese rice wine crucial to the country's culinary traditions, as an intangible cultural heritage, highlighting its role in social and cultural events. This designation follows the inclusion of 45 other cultural practices and products from around the world.
- How does the UNESCO designation connect to the broader context of Japanese cultural identity and economic interests?
- The recognition by UNESCO not only honors the centuries-old craft of sake brewing, dating back to at least the 11th century, but also celebrates its deep cultural significance in Japan. This designation aims to revitalize interest in traditional sake production and boost its global image.
- What are the potential long-term impacts of this designation on the future of sake production and consumption in Japan and globally?
- The UNESCO listing is expected to positively impact sake exports, currently valued at over \$265 million annually, primarily to the U.S. and China. Increased global interest in Japanese cuisine is anticipated to further enhance sake's market appeal and contribute to Japan's export economy.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the UNESCO recognition of sake as overwhelmingly positive, highlighting its cultural importance and economic benefits. The headline and introduction emphasize the celebratory aspects of the event. This framing might overshadow potential complexities or challenges faced by the sake industry.
Language Bias
The language used is largely positive and celebratory, employing terms like "divine gift," "crucial role," and "premier alcoholic drink." While not explicitly biased, the consistently positive tone might subtly influence reader perception. More neutral terms could include "significant role" or "important beverage."
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of sake and its cultural significance in Japan, but omits potential negative aspects such as its impact on health or the environmental impact of its production. There is no mention of any criticisms or controversies surrounding sake production or consumption. This omission could leave readers with an incomplete understanding of the product.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat idealized view of sake, contrasting its traditional aspects with the perceived shift towards imported beverages among younger generations. This creates a false dichotomy between tradition and modernity, potentially overlooking other factors influencing beverage choices.