nrc.nl
Unexplained Physical Symptoms: The Challenges of Diagnosis and the Importance of Open Communication
A physician reflects on 25 years of experience treating patients with unexplained physical symptoms, highlighting the challenges of diagnosing conditions with significant psychological components and emphasizing the importance of open communication and collaboration between patient and doctor.
- What are the main challenges faced by physicians when patients present with vague physical symptoms that lack a clear physical cause?
- For 25 years, the author has treated patients with various complaints, ranging from specific localized issues to vague, general symptoms like fatigue, malaise, and digestive problems. Many of these symptoms have a known psychological component; stress, depression, or grief can even be the sole cause. However, the author prioritizes identifying physical causes before considering psychological factors.
- How does patient denial of psychological factors influence the diagnostic process and treatment approach for unexplained physical symptoms?
- The author highlights the difficulty patients face in accepting a psychological explanation for physical symptoms, often categorically denying any mental health issues. This denial may stem from a distrust of doctors dismissing complaints or a strategic attempt to avoid addressing psychological factors. The author emphasizes the complexity of both physical and mental health, noting that neither can be fully understood.
- What are the broader implications of the ongoing debate about the relative contributions of physical and psychological factors to conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome, and how should patients and physicians navigate this uncertainty?
- The author advocates for a more open and collaborative approach, suggesting patients shouldn't prematurely rule out psychological factors in unexplained physical symptoms, and doctors should thoroughly investigate both physical and psychological possibilities. The article points to ongoing debates regarding the origins of conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome, highlighting the limitations of current medical knowledge and the need for a holistic approach.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the issue from the physician's perspective, emphasizing the difficulties in diagnosing psychosomatic illnesses and the potential for patients to deny psychological contributions. This framing might lead readers to view patients with skepticism rather than empathy.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although phrases like "strategically intended" when referring to patients who deny psychological factors could be interpreted as judgmental. The author also uses terms like 'onvoelbaar' (untranslatable, meaning roughly 'unimaginable' or 'unfathomable') which carries a subjective judgment. More neutral phrasing might be preferable.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the physician's perspective and experiences, potentially omitting the perspectives of patients with psychosomatic illnesses or mental health professionals. The analysis lacks diverse viewpoints on the complex interplay between physical and mental health.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between purely physical and purely psychological causes of illness, ignoring the complex interplay and the possibility of both contributing factors. The author presents the choice as either solely physical or solely psychological, neglecting the possibility of both.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the importance of considering both physical and mental health factors when diagnosing and treating patients with vague or non-specific symptoms. By acknowledging the significant role mental health can play in physical ailments, and encouraging a holistic approach, the article promotes better health outcomes and aligns with the SDG target of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages.