kathimerini.gr
UNHCR Criticizes Greek Asylum Suspension Bill
The UNHCR expresses concern over a Greek bill temporarily suspending asylum applications from North Africa, citing violations of international law and the right to seek asylum, while acknowledging states' right to manage borders within legal frameworks.
- How does the UNHCR's statement reconcile states' rights to manage borders with the principle of non-refoulement and the right to seek asylum?
- The UNHCR highlights Greece's history of offering protection to those fleeing war and persecution, urging its preservation. The proposed Greek legislation contravenes fundamental human rights, specifically the right to seek asylum, regardless of entry method. This action violates the principle of non-refoulement, prohibiting return to places of danger.
- What is the UNHCR's stance on the proposed Greek legislation temporarily suspending asylum applications and returning migrants from North Africa?
- The UNHCR acknowledges the strain on Gavdos and Crete due to recent migrant and refugee arrivals. States have the right to manage borders and irregular migration, but must comply with international and European law. A proposed Greek law to suspend asylum applications for three months and return arrivals from North Africa is causing serious concern.
- What are the long-term implications of insufficient European solidarity and responsibility-sharing regarding the management of migration flows at the EU's external borders?
- The UNHCR emphasizes the need for a fair and efficient asylum process to swiftly identify genuine refugees. They stress that frontline states like Greece should not bear the burden alone, advocating for strong European solidarity and responsibility-sharing. Failure to address the systemic issue of irregular migration through international cooperation will exacerbate the challenges faced by Greece and other EU border states.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The UNHCR statement frames the situation as one where Greece needs support in managing a migration crisis, emphasizing the need for EU solidarity and burden-sharing. While acknowledging Greece's right to manage its borders, the focus remains on protecting human rights and ensuring access to asylum procedures. The headline might further emphasize one aspect over the other.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual. Terms such as "irregular migration" and "legislative amendment" are objectively descriptive. However, phrases like "dangerous journey" might imply a certain level of risk, which could influence perception.
Bias by Omission
The UNHCR statement focuses on the challenges faced by Greece in managing irregular migration flows and the proposed legislative amendment. While acknowledging Greece's long tradition of offering protection, the statement does not delve into the specifics of the push and pull factors driving migration from North Africa and Sudan. Additionally, the statement doesn't explore potential solutions beyond accelerated asylum procedures and increased EU solidarity. This omission might limit a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The statement presents a dichotomy between managing borders and upholding international law, suggesting that these are mutually exclusive. However, the UNHCR clearly states that border control must comply with international and European law, thereby acknowledging the possibility of both.
Sustainable Development Goals
The UNHCR expresses serious concern over a legislative amendment that would suspend asylum applications for three months for those arriving by boat from North Africa, potentially violating international and European law and the right to seek asylum. This undermines the rule of law and access to justice for vulnerable populations.