sueddeutsche.de
Unnecessary App Permissions Enable Extensive Location Data Collection
The North Rhine-Westphalia data protection authority warns against granting unnecessary app permissions, especially location access, due to concerns about data collection and resale by third parties, as highlighted by recent investigations revealing the sale of location data of nearly 800,000 people on international markets.
- What are the immediate implications of granting excessive app permissions on smartphones?
- The North Rhine-Westphalia data protection authority warns against careless handling of smartphone app permissions, as it facilitates the collection and sale of location data by third parties. This data, combined with advertising IDs, enables the creation of detailed movement profiles.
- How do location data obtained from apps contribute to the creation of individual movement profiles?
- Unnecessary app permissions, particularly location access, enable the aggregation of user data for targeted advertising and resale on international data markets. This practice raises concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of personal information.
- What long-term systemic changes are needed to address the widespread flow of location data from apps to data brokers?
- The ongoing flow of location data from apps to data brokers highlights the urgent need for greater user awareness and stricter regulations. Future preventative measures should focus on educating users about app permissions and holding app developers accountable for data handling practices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue by emphasizing the potential risks of data collection and misuse, creating a sense of alarm and urgency. The headline and opening paragraphs highlight the warnings of the data protection authority, setting a negative tone from the start.
Language Bias
The article uses terms like "sorgloser Umgang" (careless handling) and "unseriösen Anbietern" (disreputable providers), which carry negative connotations. More neutral alternatives could be "unintentional data sharing" and "less reputable providers". The repeated emphasis on risks and warnings also contributes to a negative tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the risks of app permissions and data collection, but omits discussion of the benefits of location services, such as emergency response or navigation. It also doesn't discuss measures app developers take to protect user data, potentially providing an incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only choices are either granting full access to location data or completely disabling it. It neglects to mention intermediary options like granting access only when the app is in use or allowing only approximate location access.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights how careless app usage can lead to the exploitation of personal data, particularly location data, which is then sold to data brokers. This creates an uneven playing field where individuals with less digital literacy or awareness are disproportionately affected, exacerbating existing inequalities. The creation of detailed user profiles based on location data further contributes to this issue by enabling targeted advertising and potentially discriminatory practices.